Is GFS or MCHP cheaper?

On trailing earnings, GFS is cheaper: GFS trades at a 58.55 P/E and MCHP at 359.53.

Which has grown faster, GFS or MCHP?

Over the past five years, GFS grew revenue faster — GFS at a 6.81% CAGR versus MCHP at -2.82%.

Does GFS or MCHP pay a bigger dividend?

GFS yields 0.15% and MCHP yields 1.91% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is GFS or MCHP more profitable?

GFS runs the higher net margin — GFS at 11.37% versus MCHP at 4.29%.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) vs Microchip Technology Incorporated (MCHP)

GFS leads on 11 of 13 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. and Microchip Technology Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Microchip Technology Incorporated

$51.63B

$95.24Technology

Total return — GFS vs MCHP

growth of $100 · last 5y

GFS +75.4%MCHP +28.0%GFS compounded faster

GFS MCHP

GFS vs MCHP: by the numbers

•MCHP is the larger company ($51.63B vs $44.63B market cap).
•GFS trades at the lower earnings multiple (58.55 vs 359.53 P/E).
•GFS converts more revenue to profit (11.37% vs 4.29% net margin).
•GFS grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.81% vs -2.82% CAGR).
•MCHP pays the higher dividend yield (1.91% vs 0.15%).

Which is better, GFS or MCHP?

Metric tally: GFS 11 · MCHP 2

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueGFS(lower P/E)

GrowthGFS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeMCHP(higher dividend yield)

QualityGFS(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	GFS	MCHP
P/E ratio	58.55●	359.53
Forward P/E	42.97	—
P/S ratio	6.67●	11.07
P/B ratio	3.90●	8.11
PEG ratio	—	519.48
EV / EBITDA	20.82●	80.79
FCF yield	2.35%●	1.67%

Profitability

Metric	GFS	MCHP
Gross margin	26.40%	57.73%●
Operating margin	12.08%●	10.40%
Net margin	11.37%●	4.29%
ROE	6.65%●	3.14%
ROIC	5.23%●	3.11%

Dividends

Metric	GFS	MCHP
Dividend yield	0.15%	1.91%●
Payout ratio	7.55%	674.07%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GFS	MCHP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.81%●	-2.82%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	—	-16.62%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	45.78%●	-13.74%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	—	6.56%

Frequently asked

Which is better, GFS or MCHP?: It depends on your goal. value: GFS (lower P/E); growth: GFS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MCHP (higher dividend yield); quality: GFS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, GFS leads 11 to 2.
Is GFS or MCHP cheaper?: On trailing earnings, GFS is cheaper: GFS trades at a 58.55 P/E and MCHP at 359.53.
Which has grown faster, GFS or MCHP?: Over the past five years, GFS grew revenue faster — GFS at a 6.81% CAGR versus MCHP at -2.82%.
Does GFS or MCHP pay a bigger dividend?: GFS yields 0.15% and MCHP yields 1.91% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is GFS or MCHP more profitable?: GFS runs the higher net margin — GFS at 11.37% versus MCHP at 4.29%.

Go deeper

Full GFS analysis Full MCHP analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

GLOBALFOUNDRIES P/E ratio Microchip Technology P/E ratio GLOBALFOUNDRIES dividend yield Microchip Technology dividend yield GLOBALFOUNDRIES ROE Microchip Technology ROE GLOBALFOUNDRIES operating margin Microchip Technology operating margin GLOBALFOUNDRIES revenue growth Microchip Technology revenue growth GLOBALFOUNDRIES free cash flow Microchip Technology free cash flow

GLOBALFOUNDRIES & Microchip Technology appear in these rankings

Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.