Is GFS or GRMN cheaper?

On trailing earnings, GRMN is cheaper: GFS trades at a 58.55 P/E and GRMN at 26.54.

Which has grown faster, GFS or GRMN?

Over the past five years, GRMN grew revenue faster — GFS at a 6.81% CAGR versus GRMN at 11.13%.

Does GFS or GRMN pay a bigger dividend?

GFS yields 0.15% and GRMN yields 1.51% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is GFS or GRMN more profitable?

GRMN runs the higher net margin — GFS at 11.37% versus GRMN at 23.26%.

GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. (GFS) vs Garmin Ltd. (GRMN)

GRMN leads on 12 of 14 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of GLOBALFOUNDRIES Inc. and Garmin Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — GFS vs GRMN

growth of $100 · last 5y

GFS +75.4%GRMN +64.2%GFS compounded faster

GFS GRMN

GFS vs GRMN: by the numbers

•GRMN is the larger company ($45.92B vs $44.63B market cap).
•GRMN trades at the lower earnings multiple (26.54 vs 58.55 P/E).
•GRMN converts more revenue to profit (23.26% vs 11.37% net margin).
•GRMN grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.13% vs 6.81% CAGR).
•GRMN pays the higher dividend yield (1.51% vs 0.15%).

Which is better, GFS or GRMN?

Metric tally: GFS 2 · GRMN 12

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueGRMN(lower P/E)

GrowthGRMN(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeGRMN(higher dividend yield)

QualityGRMN(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	GFS	GRMN
P/E ratio	58.55	26.54●
Forward P/E	42.97	24.70●
P/S ratio	6.67	6.17●
P/B ratio	3.90●	4.97
PEG ratio	—	1.34
EV / EBITDA	20.82	19.20●
FCF yield	2.35%	3.15%●

Profitability

Metric	GFS	GRMN
Gross margin	26.40%	59.14%●
Operating margin	12.08%	26.46%●
Net margin	11.37%	23.26%●
ROE	6.65%	18.73%●
ROIC	5.23%	16.71%●

Dividends

Metric	GFS	GRMN
Dividend yield	0.15%	1.51%●
Payout ratio	7.55%	41.62%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GFS	GRMN
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.81%	11.13%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	—	9.55%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	45.78%●	5.80%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	—	12.86%

Frequently asked

Which is better, GFS or GRMN?: It depends on your goal. value: GRMN (lower P/E); growth: GRMN (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: GRMN (higher dividend yield); quality: GRMN (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, GRMN leads 12 to 2.
Is GFS or GRMN cheaper?: On trailing earnings, GRMN is cheaper: GFS trades at a 58.55 P/E and GRMN at 26.54.
Which has grown faster, GFS or GRMN?: Over the past five years, GRMN grew revenue faster — GFS at a 6.81% CAGR versus GRMN at 11.13%.
Does GFS or GRMN pay a bigger dividend?: GFS yields 0.15% and GRMN yields 1.51% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is GFS or GRMN more profitable?: GRMN runs the higher net margin — GFS at 11.37% versus GRMN at 23.26%.

Go deeper

Full GFS analysis Full GRMN analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

GLOBALFOUNDRIES P/E ratio Garmin P/E ratio GLOBALFOUNDRIES dividend yield Garmin dividend yield GLOBALFOUNDRIES ROE Garmin ROE GLOBALFOUNDRIES operating margin Garmin operating margin GLOBALFOUNDRIES revenue growth Garmin revenue growth GLOBALFOUNDRIES free cash flow Garmin free cash flow

GLOBALFOUNDRIES & Garmin appear in these rankings

Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.