Which has grown faster, GFF or SMR?

Over the past five years, SMR grew revenue faster — GFF at a 4.05% CAGR versus SMR at 120.81%.

Does GFF or SMR pay a bigger dividend?

GFF pays a dividend (0.92% yield) while SMR does not currently pay one.

Is GFF or SMR more profitable?

GFF runs the higher net margin — GFF at 1.27% versus SMR at -2066.55%.

Which has been the better investment, GFF or SMR?

Over the past 5-year, GFF delivered the higher annualized total return — GFF at 20.20% versus SMR at -4.42%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Griffon Corporation (GFF) vs NuScale Power Corporation (SMR)

GFF leads on 7 of 9 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Griffon Corporation and NuScale Power Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

GFF

Griffon Corporation

$4.09B

$89.07IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

SMR

NuScale Power Corporation

$2.37B

$7.96IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 3:59 PM EDT

Total return — GFF vs SMR

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y

GFF +391.0%SMR -20.0%GFF compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

GFF SMR

GFF vs SMR: by the numbers

•GFF is the larger company ($4.09B vs $2.37B market cap).
•GFF is profitable (1.27% net margin) while SMR runs a net loss (-2066.55%).
•SMR grew revenue faster over the past five years (120.81% vs 4.05% CAGR).
•GFF pays a dividend (0.92% yield) while SMR does not currently pay one.

Which is better, GFF or SMR?

Metric tally: GFF 7 · SMR 2

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthSMR(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityGFF(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	GFF	SMR
P/E ratio	127.04	—
P/S ratio	1.78●	69.81
P/B ratio	44.25	1.12●
PEG ratio	7.36	—
EV / EBITDA	21.94	—
FCF yield	6.87%	—

Profitability

Metric	GFF	SMR
Gross margin	42.62%●	36.31%
Operating margin	8.32%●	-2190.57%
Net margin	1.27%●	-2066.55%
ROE	31.61%●	-33.06%
ROIC	4.68%●	-61.76%

Dividends

Metric	GFF	SMR
Dividend yield	0.92%	—
Payout ratio	74.34%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GFF	SMR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	4.05%	120.81%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	17.25%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	19.27%	—
Total return CAGR (5Y)	33.18%●	-4.42%

Frequently asked

Which is better, GFF or SMR?: It depends on your goal. growth: SMR (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: GFF (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, GFF leads 7 to 2.
Which has grown faster, GFF or SMR?: Over the past five years, SMR grew revenue faster — GFF at a 4.05% CAGR versus SMR at 120.81%.
Does GFF or SMR pay a bigger dividend?: GFF pays a dividend (0.92% yield) while SMR does not currently pay one.
Is GFF or SMR more profitable?: GFF runs the higher net margin — GFF at 1.27% versus SMR at -2066.55%.
Which has been the better investment, GFF or SMR?: Over the past 5-year, GFF delivered the higher annualized total return — GFF at 20.20% versus SMR at -4.42%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full GFF analysis Full SMR analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Griffon P/E ratio NuScale Power P/E ratio Griffon dividend yield NuScale Power dividend yield Griffon ROE NuScale Power ROE Griffon operating margin NuScale Power operating margin Griffon revenue growth NuScale Power revenue growth Griffon free cash flow NuScale Power free cash flow

Griffon & NuScale Power appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 20, 2026.