Which has grown faster, GF or HIVE?

Over the past five years, HIVE grew revenue faster — GF at a -3.04% CAGR versus HIVE at 34.49%.

Does GF or HIVE pay a bigger dividend?

GF pays a dividend (2.44% yield) while HIVE does not currently pay one.

Is GF or HIVE more profitable?

GF runs the higher net margin — GF at 286.83% versus HIVE at -49.85%.

Which has been the better investment, GF or HIVE?

Over the past 10-year, HIVE delivered the higher annualized total return — GF at 6.01% versus HIVE at 43.70%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

The New Germany Fund, Inc. (GF) vs HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. (HIVE)

GF leads on 6 of 9 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of The New Germany Fund, Inc. and HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 26, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

The New Germany Fund, Inc.

$189M

$11.65Financial Services

HIVE

HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd.

$1.00B

$4.14Financial Services

Total return — GF vs HIVE

growth of $100 · last 15y

GF -30.5%HIVE +103.1%HIVE compounded faster

GF HIVE

GF vs HIVE: by the numbers

•HIVE is the larger company ($1.00B vs $189M market cap).
•GF is profitable (286.83% net margin) while HIVE runs a net loss (-49.85%).
•HIVE grew revenue faster over the past five years (34.49% vs -3.04% CAGR).
•GF pays a dividend (2.44% yield) while HIVE does not currently pay one.

Which is better, GF or HIVE?

Metric tally: GF 6 · HIVE 3

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthHIVE(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityGF(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	GF	HIVE
P/E ratio	5.32	—
Forward P/E	5.14	—
P/S ratio	15.30	3.13●
P/B ratio	0.92●	1.76
PEG ratio	0.02	—

Profitability

Metric	GF	HIVE
Gross margin	85.03%●	-21.00%
Operating margin	-98.27%	-40.22%●
Net margin	286.83%●	-49.85%
ROE	17.19%●	-28.04%
ROIC	26.89%●	-19.94%

Dividends

Metric	GF	HIVE
Dividend yield	2.44%	—
Payout ratio	8.27%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	GF	HIVE
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-3.04%	34.49%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-11.39%	—
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-8.37%●	-19.84%

Frequently asked

Which is better, GF or HIVE?: It depends on your goal. growth: HIVE (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: GF (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, GF leads 6 to 3.
Which has grown faster, GF or HIVE?: Over the past five years, HIVE grew revenue faster — GF at a -3.04% CAGR versus HIVE at 34.49%.
Does GF or HIVE pay a bigger dividend?: GF pays a dividend (2.44% yield) while HIVE does not currently pay one.
Is GF or HIVE more profitable?: GF runs the higher net margin — GF at 286.83% versus HIVE at -49.85%.
Which has been the better investment, GF or HIVE?: Over the past 10-year, HIVE delivered the higher annualized total return — GF at 6.01% versus HIVE at 43.70%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full GF analysis Full HIVE analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

New Germany Fund P/E ratio HIVE Digital Technologies P/E ratio New Germany Fund dividend yield HIVE Digital Technologies dividend yield New Germany Fund ROE HIVE Digital Technologies ROE New Germany Fund operating margin HIVE Digital Technologies operating margin New Germany Fund revenue growth HIVE Digital Technologies revenue growth New Germany Fund free cash flow HIVE Digital Technologies free cash flow

New Germany Fund & HIVE Digital Technologies appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 26, 2026.