The Gap, Inc. (GAP) vs Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO)
GAP leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of The Gap, Inc. and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
GAP
The Gap, Inc.
$19.01Consumer CyclicalAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
SIMO
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation
$270.90TechnologyAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — GAP vs SIMO
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 21yGAP +72.9%SIMO +3536.4%SIMO compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
GAP SIMO
GAP vs SIMO: by the numbers
- •SIMO is the larger company ($9.09B vs $6.84B market cap).
- •GAP trades at the lower earnings multiple (7.48 vs 21.10 P/E).
- •SIMO converts more revenue to profit (16.02% vs 6.25% net margin).
- •SIMO grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.49% vs 2.17% CAGR).
- •GAP pays the higher dividend yield (3.52% vs 0.74%).
Which is better, GAP or SIMO?
Metric tally: GAP 9 · SIMO 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueGAP(lower P/E)
GrowthSIMO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeGAP(higher dividend yield)
QualitySIMO(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | GAP | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 7.48● | 21.10 |
| Forward P/E | 8.83● | 30.51 |
| P/S ratio | 0.47● | 2.57 |
| P/B ratio | 1.97● | 2.74 |
| PEG ratio | 0.49 | 0.17● |
| EV / EBITDA | 5.92● | 16.83 |
| FCF yield | 17.76%● | 0.28% |
Profitability
| Metric | GAP | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 40.50% | 48.09%● |
| Operating margin | 8.44% | 12.77%● |
| Net margin | 6.25% | 16.02%● |
| ROE | 26.32%● | 18.76% |
| ROIC | 8.06% | 9.22%● |
Dividends
| Metric | GAP | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.52%● | 0.74% |
| Payout ratio | 30.73% | 13.70% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | GAP | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 2.17% | 12.49%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 15.25% | 44.85%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 2.60%● | -42.15% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -4.54% | 37.15%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, GAP or SIMO?
- It depends on your goal. value: GAP (lower P/E); growth: SIMO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: GAP (higher dividend yield); quality: SIMO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, GAP leads 9 to 8.
- Is GAP or SIMO cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, GAP is cheaper: GAP trades at a 7.48 P/E and SIMO at 21.10.
- Which has grown faster, GAP or SIMO?
- Over the past five years, SIMO grew revenue faster — GAP at a 2.17% CAGR versus SIMO at 12.49%.
- Does GAP or SIMO pay a bigger dividend?
- GAP yields 3.52% and SIMO yields 0.74% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is GAP or SIMO more profitable?
- SIMO runs the higher net margin — GAP at 6.25% versus SIMO at 16.02%.
- Which has been the better investment, GAP or SIMO?
- Over the past 10-year, SIMO delivered the higher annualized total return — GAP at 1.00% versus SIMO at 20.85%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Gap P/E ratioSilicon Motion Technology P/E ratioGap dividend yieldSilicon Motion Technology dividend yieldGap ROESilicon Motion Technology ROEGap operating marginSilicon Motion Technology operating marginGap revenue growthSilicon Motion Technology revenue growthGap free cash flowSilicon Motion Technology free cash flow
Gap & Silicon Motion Technology appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 25, 2026.