Is FTV or SWK cheaper?

On trailing earnings, SWK is cheaper: FTV trades at a 35.80 P/E and SWK at 34.27.

Which has grown faster, FTV or SWK?

Over the past five years, SWK grew revenue faster — FTV at a -0.20% CAGR versus SWK at 0.68%.

Does FTV or SWK pay a bigger dividend?

FTV yields 0.30% and SWK yields 3.97% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is FTV or SWK more profitable?

FTV runs the higher net margin — FTV at 11.48% versus SWK at 2.44%.

Which has been the better investment, FTV or SWK?

Over the past 5-year, FTV delivered the higher annualized total return — FTV at 2.65% versus SWK at -0.31%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Fortive Corporation (FTV) vs Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. (SWK)

FTV and SWK are evenly matched — 8 metrics each of 16.

A side-by-side comparison of Fortive Corporation and Stanley Black & Decker, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Stanley Black & Decker, Inc.

$13.00B

$83.62Industrials

Total return — FTV vs SWK

growth of $100 · last 10y

FTV +96.2%SWK -25.6%FTV compounded faster

FTV SWK

FTV vs SWK: by the numbers

•FTV is the larger company ($18.33B vs $13.00B market cap).
•SWK trades at the lower earnings multiple (34.27 vs 35.80 P/E).
•FTV converts more revenue to profit (11.48% vs 2.44% net margin).
•SWK grew revenue faster over the past five years (0.68% vs -0.20% CAGR).
•SWK pays the higher dividend yield (3.97% vs 0.30%).

Which is better, FTV or SWK?

Metric tally: FTV 8 · SWK 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueSWK(lower P/E)

GrowthSWK(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeSWK(higher dividend yield)

QualityFTV(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	FTV	SWK
P/E ratio	35.80	34.27●
Forward P/E	18.69	15.62●
P/S ratio	3.97	0.84●
P/B ratio	3.09	1.42●
PEG ratio	—	0.82
EV / EBITDA	17.93	15.04●
FCF yield	5.16%	5.69%●

Profitability

Metric	FTV	SWK
Gross margin	61.83%●	30.03%
Operating margin	17.73%●	7.79%
Net margin	11.48%●	2.44%
ROE	8.94%●	4.13%
ROIC	7.44%●	7.21%

Dividends

Metric	FTV	SWK
Dividend yield	0.30%	3.97%●
Payout ratio	10.29%	125.28%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FTV	SWK
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	-0.20%	0.68%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-17.51%●	-19.52%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-7.26%●	-17.64%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	2.65%●	-13.22%

Frequently asked

Which is better, FTV or SWK?: It depends on your goal. value: SWK (lower P/E); growth: SWK (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: SWK (higher dividend yield); quality: FTV (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
Is FTV or SWK cheaper?: On trailing earnings, SWK is cheaper: FTV trades at a 35.80 P/E and SWK at 34.27.
Which has grown faster, FTV or SWK?: Over the past five years, SWK grew revenue faster — FTV at a -0.20% CAGR versus SWK at 0.68%.
Does FTV or SWK pay a bigger dividend?: FTV yields 0.30% and SWK yields 3.97% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is FTV or SWK more profitable?: FTV runs the higher net margin — FTV at 11.48% versus SWK at 2.44%.
Which has been the better investment, FTV or SWK?: Over the past 5-year, FTV delivered the higher annualized total return — FTV at 2.65% versus SWK at -0.31%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FTV analysis Full SWK analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Fortive P/E ratio Stanley Black & Decker P/E ratio Fortive dividend yield Stanley Black & Decker dividend yield Fortive ROE Stanley Black & Decker ROE Fortive operating margin Stanley Black & Decker operating margin Fortive revenue growth Stanley Black & Decker revenue growth Fortive free cash flow Stanley Black & Decker free cash flow

Fortive & Stanley Black & Decker appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Dividend Aristocrats Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.