Fortive Corporation (FTV) vs Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL)
FTV leads on 8 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Fortive Corporation and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 7, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
FTV
Fortive Corporation
$62.71Industrials
STRL
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
$668.26Industrials
Total return — FTV vs STRL
growth of $100 · last 10yFTV +107.5%STRL +13690.6%STRL compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
FTV STRL
FTV vs STRL: by the numbers
- •STRL is the larger company ($20.51B vs $19.12B market cap).
- •FTV trades at the lower earnings multiple (37.86 vs 64.14 P/E).
- •STRL converts more revenue to profit (12.02% vs 11.48% net margin).
- •STRL grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.81% vs -0.20% CAGR).
- •FTV pays a dividend (0.38% yield) while STRL does not currently pay one.
Which is better, FTV or STRL?
Metric tally: FTV 8 · STRL 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueFTV(lower P/E)
GrowthSTRL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualitySTRL(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | FTV | STRL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 37.86● | 64.14 |
| Forward P/E | 21.25● | 37.96 |
| P/S ratio | 4.20● | 7.72 |
| P/B ratio | 3.27● | 18.71 |
| PEG ratio | — | 2.34 |
| EV / EBITDA | 18.33● | 38.03 |
| FCF yield | 4.88%● | 1.98% |
Profitability
| Metric | FTV | STRL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 61.83%● | 23.29% |
| Operating margin | 17.73%● | 17.25% |
| Net margin | 11.48% | 12.02%● |
| ROE | 8.94% | 29.14%● |
| ROIC | 7.44% | 19.06%● |
Dividends
| Metric | FTV | STRL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.38% | — |
| Payout ratio | 13.71% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FTV | STRL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -0.20% | 14.81%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -17.51% | 44.28%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -7.26% | 31.85%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 4.33% | 97.69%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, FTV or STRL?
- It depends on your goal. value: FTV (lower P/E); growth: STRL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: STRL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, FTV leads 8 to 7.
- Is FTV or STRL cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, FTV is cheaper: FTV trades at a 37.86 P/E and STRL at 64.14.
- Which has grown faster, FTV or STRL?
- Over the past five years, STRL grew revenue faster — FTV at a -0.20% CAGR versus STRL at 14.81%.
- Does FTV or STRL pay a bigger dividend?
- FTV pays a dividend (0.38% yield) while STRL does not currently pay one.
- Is FTV or STRL more profitable?
- STRL runs the higher net margin — FTV at 11.48% versus STRL at 12.02%.
- Which has been the better investment, FTV or STRL?
- Over the past 10-year, STRL delivered the higher annualized total return — FTV at 8.21% versus STRL at 61.88%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Fortive P/E ratioSterling Infrastructure P/E ratioFortive dividend yieldSterling Infrastructure dividend yieldFortive ROESterling Infrastructure ROEFortive operating marginSterling Infrastructure operating marginFortive revenue growthSterling Infrastructure revenue growthFortive free cash flowSterling Infrastructure free cash flow
Fortive & Sterling Infrastructure appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 7, 2026.