Fortive Corporation (FTV) vs Snap-on Incorporated (SNA)
SNA leads on 11 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Fortive Corporation and Snap-on Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — FTV vs SNA
growth of $100 · last 10yFTV +101.4%SNA +158.6%SNA compounded faster
FTV SNA
FTV vs SNA: by the numbers
- •SNA is the larger company ($20.77B vs $18.82B market cap).
- •SNA trades at the lower earnings multiple (20.71 vs 36.74 P/E).
- •SNA converts more revenue to profit (19.99% vs 11.48% net margin).
- •SNA grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.87% vs -0.20% CAGR).
- •SNA pays the higher dividend yield (2.36% vs 0.39%).
Which is better, FTV or SNA?
Metric tally: FTV 3 · SNA 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSNA(lower P/E)
GrowthSNA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeSNA(higher dividend yield)
QualitySNA(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | FTV | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 36.74 | 20.71● |
| Forward P/E | 19.18● | 20.98 |
| P/S ratio | 4.08 | 4.13 |
| P/B ratio | 3.17● | 3.55 |
| PEG ratio | — | 1.87 |
| EV / EBITDA | 18.34 | 13.82● |
| FCF yield | 5.03% | 5.10% |
Profitability
| Metric | FTV | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 61.83%● | 51.30% |
| Operating margin | 17.73% | 24.71%● |
| Net margin | 11.48% | 19.99%● |
| ROE | 8.94% | 17.18%● |
| ROIC | 7.44% | 13.79%● |
Dividends
| Metric | FTV | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.39% | 2.36%● |
| Payout ratio | 13.71% | 48.46% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FTV | SNA |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -0.20% | 5.87%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -17.51% | 11.05%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -7.26% | 0.58%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 3.65% | 15.53%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, FTV or SNA?
- It depends on your goal. value: SNA (lower P/E); growth: SNA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: SNA (higher dividend yield); quality: SNA (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SNA leads 11 to 3.
- Is FTV or SNA cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, SNA is cheaper: FTV trades at a 36.74 P/E and SNA at 20.71.
- Which has grown faster, FTV or SNA?
- Over the past five years, SNA grew revenue faster — FTV at a -0.20% CAGR versus SNA at 5.87%.
- Does FTV or SNA pay a bigger dividend?
- FTV yields 0.39% and SNA yields 2.36% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is FTV or SNA more profitable?
- SNA runs the higher net margin — FTV at 11.48% versus SNA at 19.99%.
- Which has been the better investment, FTV or SNA?
- Over the past 5-year, SNA delivered the higher annualized total return — FTV at 3.65% versus SNA at 13.03%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Fortive P/E ratioSnap-on P/E ratioFortive dividend yieldSnap-on dividend yieldFortive ROESnap-on ROEFortive operating marginSnap-on operating marginFortive revenue growthSnap-on revenue growthFortive free cash flowSnap-on free cash flow
Fortive & Snap-on appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.