Fortive Corporation (FTV) vs Lennox International Inc. (LII)
LII leads on 11 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Fortive Corporation and Lennox International Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — FTV vs LII
growth of $100 · last 10yFTV +96.2%LII +259.0%LII compounded faster
FTV LII
FTV vs LII: by the numbers
- •FTV is the larger company ($18.33B vs $17.82B market cap).
- •LII trades at the lower earnings multiple (23.07 vs 35.80 P/E).
- •LII converts more revenue to profit (14.89% vs 11.48% net margin).
- •LII grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.48% vs -0.20% CAGR).
- •LII pays the higher dividend yield (1.02% vs 0.30%).
Which is better, FTV or LII?
Metric tally: FTV 4 · LII 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueLII(lower P/E)
GrowthLII(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeLII(higher dividend yield)
QualityLII(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | FTV | LII |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 35.80 | 23.07● |
| Forward P/E | 18.69● | 19.23 |
| P/S ratio | 3.97 | 3.41● |
| P/B ratio | 3.09● | 14.77 |
| PEG ratio | — | 1.21 |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.93 | 17.59 |
| FCF yield | 5.16%● | 3.69% |
Profitability
| Metric | FTV | LII |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 61.83%● | 33.06% |
| Operating margin | 17.73% | 19.52%● |
| Net margin | 11.48% | 14.89%● |
| ROE | 8.94% | 64.51%● |
| ROIC | 7.44% | 25.51%● |
Dividends
| Metric | FTV | LII |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.30% | 1.02%● |
| Payout ratio | 10.29% | 23.31% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FTV | LII |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -0.20% | 6.48%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -17.51% | 19.13%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -7.26% | 1.44%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 2.65% | 9.91%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, FTV or LII?
- It depends on your goal. value: LII (lower P/E); growth: LII (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: LII (higher dividend yield); quality: LII (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LII leads 11 to 4.
- Is FTV or LII cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, LII is cheaper: FTV trades at a 35.80 P/E and LII at 23.07.
- Which has grown faster, FTV or LII?
- Over the past five years, LII grew revenue faster — FTV at a -0.20% CAGR versus LII at 6.48%.
- Does FTV or LII pay a bigger dividend?
- FTV yields 0.30% and LII yields 1.02% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is FTV or LII more profitable?
- LII runs the higher net margin — FTV at 11.48% versus LII at 14.89%.
- Which has been the better investment, FTV or LII?
- Over the past 5-year, LII delivered the higher annualized total return — FTV at 2.65% versus LII at 15.35%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Fortive P/E ratioLennox International P/E ratioFortive dividend yieldLennox International dividend yieldFortive ROELennox International ROEFortive operating marginLennox International operating marginFortive revenue growthLennox International revenue growthFortive free cash flowLennox International free cash flow
Fortive & Lennox International appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.