Fortive Corporation (FTV) vs Hubbell Incorporated (HUBB)
HUBB leads on 11 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Fortive Corporation and Hubbell Incorporated across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — FTV vs HUBB
growth of $100 · last 10yFTV +96.2%HUBB +358.6%HUBB compounded faster
FTV HUBB
FTV vs HUBB: by the numbers
- •HUBB is the larger company ($25.20B vs $18.33B market cap).
- •HUBB trades at the lower earnings multiple (28.17 vs 35.80 P/E).
- •HUBB converts more revenue to profit (15.10% vs 11.48% net margin).
- •HUBB grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.15% vs -0.20% CAGR).
- •HUBB pays the higher dividend yield (1.17% vs 0.30%).
Which is better, FTV or HUBB?
Metric tally: FTV 5 · HUBB 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueHUBB(lower P/E)
GrowthHUBB(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeHUBB(higher dividend yield)
QualityHUBB(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | FTV | HUBB |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 35.80 | 28.17● |
| Forward P/E | 18.69● | 24.14 |
| P/S ratio | 3.97● | 4.24 |
| P/B ratio | 3.09● | 6.73 |
| PEG ratio | — | 1.78 |
| EV / EBITDA | 19.78 | 19.26● |
| FCF yield | 5.16%● | 3.58% |
Profitability
| Metric | FTV | HUBB |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 61.83%● | 35.52% |
| Operating margin | 17.73% | 20.77%● |
| Net margin | 11.48% | 15.10%● |
| ROE | 8.94% | 23.97%● |
| ROIC | 7.44% | 13.76%● |
Dividends
| Metric | FTV | HUBB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.30% | 1.17%● |
| Payout ratio | 10.29% | 33.55% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FTV | HUBB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | -0.20% | 8.15%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | -17.51% | 20.82%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -7.26% | 12.34%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 2.65% | 22.81%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, FTV or HUBB?
- It depends on your goal. value: HUBB (lower P/E); growth: HUBB (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: HUBB (higher dividend yield); quality: HUBB (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, HUBB leads 11 to 5.
- Is FTV or HUBB cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, HUBB is cheaper: FTV trades at a 35.80 P/E and HUBB at 28.17.
- Which has grown faster, FTV or HUBB?
- Over the past five years, HUBB grew revenue faster — FTV at a -0.20% CAGR versus HUBB at 8.15%.
- Does FTV or HUBB pay a bigger dividend?
- FTV yields 0.30% and HUBB yields 1.17% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is FTV or HUBB more profitable?
- HUBB runs the higher net margin — FTV at 11.48% versus HUBB at 15.10%.
- Which has been the better investment, FTV or HUBB?
- Over the past 5-year, HUBB delivered the higher annualized total return — FTV at 2.65% versus HUBB at 19.00%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Fortive P/E ratioHubbell P/E ratioFortive dividend yieldHubbell dividend yieldFortive ROEHubbell ROEFortive operating marginHubbell operating marginFortive revenue growthHubbell revenue growthFortive free cash flowHubbell free cash flow
Fortive & Hubbell appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.