Which has grown faster, FT or HIVE?

Over the past five years, HIVE grew revenue faster — FT at a 3.92% CAGR versus HIVE at 34.49%.

Does FT or HIVE pay a bigger dividend?

FT pays a dividend (6.34% yield) while HIVE does not currently pay one.

Is FT or HIVE more profitable?

FT runs the higher net margin — FT at 179.50% versus HIVE at -49.85%.

Which has been the better investment, FT or HIVE?

Over the past 10-year, HIVE delivered the higher annualized total return — FT at 8.42% versus HIVE at 43.70%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Franklin Universal Trust (FT) vs HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. (HIVE)

FT leads on 7 of 9 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Franklin Universal Trust and HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Franklin Universal Trust

$202M

$8.04Financial Services

HIVE

HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd.

$1.00B

$4.14Financial Services

Total return — FT vs HIVE

growth of $100 · last 15y

FT +25.8%HIVE +103.1%HIVE compounded faster

FT HIVE

FT vs HIVE: by the numbers

•HIVE is the larger company ($1.00B vs $202M market cap).
•FT is profitable (179.50% net margin) while HIVE runs a net loss (-49.85%).
•HIVE grew revenue faster over the past five years (34.49% vs 3.92% CAGR).
•FT pays a dividend (6.34% yield) while HIVE does not currently pay one.

Which is better, FT or HIVE?

Metric tally: FT 7 · HIVE 2

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthHIVE(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityFT(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	FT	HIVE
P/E ratio	3.00	—
P/S ratio	5.41	3.13●
P/B ratio	0.89●	1.76

Profitability

Metric	FT	HIVE
Gross margin	86.88%●	-21.00%
Operating margin	198.87%●	-40.22%
Net margin	179.50%●	-49.85%
ROE	29.45%●	-28.04%
ROIC	8.38%●	-19.94%

Dividends

Metric	FT	HIVE
Dividend yield	6.34%	—
Payout ratio	67.11%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FT	HIVE
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	3.92%	34.49%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-3.82%	—
Total return CAGR (5Y)	6.94%●	-19.84%

Frequently asked

Which is better, FT or HIVE?: It depends on your goal. growth: HIVE (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: FT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, FT leads 7 to 2.
Which has grown faster, FT or HIVE?: Over the past five years, HIVE grew revenue faster — FT at a 3.92% CAGR versus HIVE at 34.49%.
Does FT or HIVE pay a bigger dividend?: FT pays a dividend (6.34% yield) while HIVE does not currently pay one.
Is FT or HIVE more profitable?: FT runs the higher net margin — FT at 179.50% versus HIVE at -49.85%.
Which has been the better investment, FT or HIVE?: Over the past 10-year, HIVE delivered the higher annualized total return — FT at 8.42% versus HIVE at 43.70%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FT analysis Full HIVE analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Franklin Universal P/E ratio HIVE Digital Technologies P/E ratio Franklin Universal dividend yield HIVE Digital Technologies dividend yield Franklin Universal ROE HIVE Digital Technologies ROE Franklin Universal operating margin HIVE Digital Technologies operating margin Franklin Universal revenue growth HIVE Digital Technologies revenue growth Franklin Universal free cash flow HIVE Digital Technologies free cash flow

Franklin Universal & HIVE Digital Technologies appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 25, 2026.