First Solar, Inc. (FSLR) vs Texas Pacific Land Corporation (TPL)
FSLR leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of First Solar, Inc. and Texas Pacific Land Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 27, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — FSLR vs TPL
growth of $100 · last 20yFSLR +866.3%TPL +10315.5%TPL compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
FSLR TPL
FSLR vs TPL: by the numbers
- •TPL is the larger company ($27.30B vs $25.69B market cap).
- •FSLR trades at the lower earnings multiple (15.44 vs 54.27 P/E).
- •TPL converts more revenue to profit (60.03% vs 30.73% net margin).
- •TPL grew revenue faster over the past five years (23.67% vs 12.69% CAGR).
- •TPL pays a dividend (0.61% yield) while FSLR does not currently pay one.
Which is better, FSLR or TPL?
Metric tally: FSLR 10 · TPL 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueFSLR(lower P/E)
GrowthTPL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityTPL(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | FSLR | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 15.44● | 54.27 |
| Forward P/E | 9.93● | 43.17 |
| P/S ratio | 4.75● | 32.55 |
| P/B ratio | 2.60● | 17.55 |
| PEG ratio | 1.01● | 6.83 |
| EV / EBITDA | 10.13● | 39.30 |
| FCF yield | 6.48%● | 1.81% |
Profitability
| Metric | FSLR | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 41.73% | 85.46%● |
| Operating margin | 33.17% | 74.42%● |
| Net margin | 30.73% | 60.03%● |
| ROE | 16.86% | 32.37%● |
| ROIC | 14.42% | 30.12%● |
Dividends
| Metric | FSLR | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 0.61% |
| Payout ratio | — | 34.38% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FSLR | TPL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.69% | 23.67%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 30.54%● | 22.57% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 55.54%● | 18.77% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 22.15%● | 18.39% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, FSLR or TPL?
- It depends on your goal. value: FSLR (lower P/E); growth: TPL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: TPL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, FSLR leads 10 to 6.
- Is FSLR or TPL cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, FSLR is cheaper: FSLR trades at a 15.44 P/E and TPL at 54.27.
- Which has grown faster, FSLR or TPL?
- Over the past five years, TPL grew revenue faster — FSLR at a 12.69% CAGR versus TPL at 23.67%.
- Does FSLR or TPL pay a bigger dividend?
- TPL pays a dividend (0.61% yield) while FSLR does not currently pay one.
- Is FSLR or TPL more profitable?
- TPL runs the higher net margin — FSLR at 30.73% versus TPL at 60.03%.
- Which has been the better investment, FSLR or TPL?
- Over the past 10-year, TPL delivered the higher annualized total return — FSLR at 17.90% versus TPL at 37.72%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
First Solar P/E ratioTexas Pacific Land P/E ratioFirst Solar dividend yieldTexas Pacific Land dividend yieldFirst Solar ROETexas Pacific Land ROEFirst Solar operating marginTexas Pacific Land operating marginFirst Solar revenue growthTexas Pacific Land revenue growthFirst Solar free cash flowTexas Pacific Land free cash flow
First Solar & Texas Pacific Land appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 27, 2026.