Is FN or VRSK cheaper?

On trailing earnings, VRSK is cheaper: FN trades at a 52.49 P/E and VRSK at 27.98.

Which has grown faster, FN or VRSK?

Over the past five years, FN grew revenue faster — FN at a 18.99% CAGR versus VRSK at 1.92%.

Does FN or VRSK pay a bigger dividend?

VRSK pays a dividend (0.76% yield) while FN does not currently pay one.

Is FN or VRSK more profitable?

VRSK runs the higher net margin — FN at 9.87% versus VRSK at 29.34%.

Which has been the better investment, FN or VRSK?

Over the past 10-year, FN delivered the higher annualized total return — FN at 32.51% versus VRSK at 9.36%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Fabrinet (FN) vs Verisk Analytics, Inc. (VRSK)

VRSK leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Fabrinet and Verisk Analytics, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Verisk Analytics, Inc.

$24.08B

$183.80Technology

Total return — FN vs VRSK

growth of $100 · last 16y

FN +5583.8%VRSK +494.2%FN compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

FN VRSK

FN vs VRSK: by the numbers

•VRSK is the larger company ($24.08B vs $21.89B market cap).
•VRSK trades at the lower earnings multiple (27.98 vs 52.49 P/E).
•VRSK converts more revenue to profit (29.34% vs 9.87% net margin).
•FN grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.99% vs 1.92% CAGR).
•VRSK pays a dividend (0.76% yield) while FN does not currently pay one.

Which is better, FN or VRSK?

Metric tally: FN 6 · VRSK 10

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueVRSK(lower P/E)

GrowthFN(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityVRSK(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	FN	VRSK
P/E ratio	52.49	27.98●
Forward P/E	44.26	21.23●
P/S ratio	5.23●	8.01
P/B ratio	9.60●	82.71
PEG ratio	2.47●	3.39
EV / EBITDA	42.67	17.33●
FCF yield	0.21%	4.54%●

Profitability

Metric	FN	VRSK
Gross margin	11.96%	67.44%●
Operating margin	9.78%	44.87%●
Net margin	9.87%	29.34%●
ROE	18.14%	293.95%●
ROIC	15.01%	19.56%●

Dividends

Metric	FN	VRSK
Dividend yield	—	0.76%
Payout ratio	—	21.51%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FN	VRSK
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	18.99%●	1.92%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	24.62%●	8.25%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-9.50%	4.58%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	45.36%●	1.98%

Frequently asked

Which is better, FN or VRSK?: It depends on your goal. value: VRSK (lower P/E); growth: FN (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: VRSK (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, VRSK leads 10 to 6.
Is FN or VRSK cheaper?: On trailing earnings, VRSK is cheaper: FN trades at a 52.49 P/E and VRSK at 27.98.
Which has grown faster, FN or VRSK?: Over the past five years, FN grew revenue faster — FN at a 18.99% CAGR versus VRSK at 1.92%.
Does FN or VRSK pay a bigger dividend?: VRSK pays a dividend (0.76% yield) while FN does not currently pay one.
Is FN or VRSK more profitable?: VRSK runs the higher net margin — FN at 9.87% versus VRSK at 29.34%.
Which has been the better investment, FN or VRSK?: Over the past 10-year, FN delivered the higher annualized total return — FN at 32.51% versus VRSK at 9.36%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FN analysis Full VRSK analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Fabrinet P/E ratio Verisk Analytics P/E ratio Fabrinet dividend yield Verisk Analytics dividend yield Fabrinet ROE Verisk Analytics ROE Fabrinet operating margin Verisk Analytics operating margin Fabrinet revenue growth Verisk Analytics revenue growth Fabrinet free cash flow Verisk Analytics free cash flow

Fabrinet & Verisk Analytics appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.