On trailing earnings, RL is cheaper: FN trades at a 52.49 P/E and RL at 26.74.

Which has grown faster, FN or RL?

Over the past five years, FN grew revenue faster — FN at a 18.99% CAGR versus RL at 13.01%.

Does FN or RL pay a bigger dividend?

RL pays a dividend (0.90% yield) while FN does not currently pay one.

Is FN or RL more profitable?

RL runs the higher net margin — FN at 9.87% versus RL at 11.60%.

Which has been the better investment, FN or RL?

Over the past 10-year, FN delivered the higher annualized total return — FN at 32.51% versus RL at 17.77%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Fabrinet (FN) vs Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL)

RL leads on 13 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Fabrinet and Ralph Lauren Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Fabrinet

$21.89B

$611.01Technology

Ralph Lauren Corporation

$24.64B

$403.98Consumer Cyclical

Total return — FN vs RL

growth of $100 · last 16y

FN +5583.8%RL +422.8%FN compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

FN RL

FN vs RL: by the numbers

•RL is the larger company ($24.64B vs $21.89B market cap).
•RL trades at the lower earnings multiple (26.74 vs 52.49 P/E).
•RL converts more revenue to profit (11.60% vs 9.87% net margin).
•FN grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.99% vs 13.01% CAGR).
•RL pays a dividend (0.90% yield) while FN does not currently pay one.

Which is better, FN or RL?

Metric tally: FN 3 · RL 13

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueRL(lower P/E)

GrowthFN(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityRL(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	FN	RL
P/E ratio	52.49	26.74●
Forward P/E	44.26	22.03●
P/S ratio	5.23	3.10●
P/B ratio	9.60	8.86●
PEG ratio	2.47	0.71●
EV / EBITDA	42.67	22.22●
FCF yield	0.21%	2.96%●

Profitability

Metric	FN	RL
Gross margin	11.96%	69.87%●
Operating margin	9.78%	14.53%●
Net margin	9.87%	11.60%●
ROE	18.14%	33.13%●
ROIC	15.01%	19.62%●

Dividends

Metric	FN	RL
Dividend yield	—	0.90%
Payout ratio	—	23.67%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FN	RL
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	18.99%●	13.01%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	24.62%●	20.37%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-9.50%	22.25%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	45.36%●	29.56%

Frequently asked

Which is better, FN or RL?: It depends on your goal. value: RL (lower P/E); growth: FN (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: RL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, RL leads 13 to 3.
Is FN or RL cheaper?: On trailing earnings, RL is cheaper: FN trades at a 52.49 P/E and RL at 26.74.
Which has grown faster, FN or RL?: Over the past five years, FN grew revenue faster — FN at a 18.99% CAGR versus RL at 13.01%.
Does FN or RL pay a bigger dividend?: RL pays a dividend (0.90% yield) while FN does not currently pay one.
Is FN or RL more profitable?: RL runs the higher net margin — FN at 9.87% versus RL at 11.60%.
Which has been the better investment, FN or RL?: Over the past 10-year, FN delivered the higher annualized total return — FN at 32.51% versus RL at 17.77%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FN analysis Full RL analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Fabrinet P/E ratio Ralph Lauren P/E ratio Fabrinet dividend yield Ralph Lauren dividend yield Fabrinet ROE Ralph Lauren ROE Fabrinet operating margin Ralph Lauren operating margin Fabrinet revenue growth Ralph Lauren revenue growth Fabrinet free cash flow Ralph Lauren free cash flow

Fabrinet & Ralph Lauren appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.