Is FN or POWL cheaper?

On trailing earnings, FN is cheaper: FN trades at a 52.49 P/E and POWL at 57.61.

Which has grown faster, FN or POWL?

Over the past five years, POWL grew revenue faster — FN at a 18.99% CAGR versus POWL at 19.84%.

Does FN or POWL pay a bigger dividend?

POWL pays a dividend (0.12% yield) while FN does not currently pay one.

Is FN or POWL more profitable?

POWL runs the higher net margin — FN at 9.87% versus POWL at 16.51%.

Which has been the better investment, FN or POWL?

Over the past 10-year, POWL delivered the higher annualized total return — FN at 32.51% versus POWL at 47.08%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Fabrinet (FN) vs Powell Industries, Inc. (POWL)

POWL leads on 12 of 15 compared metrics, though FN is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of Fabrinet and Powell Industries, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Powell Industries, Inc.

$10.74B

$294.75Industrials

Total return — FN vs POWL

growth of $100 · last 16y

FN +5583.8%POWL +2989.6%FN compounded faster

FN POWL

FN vs POWL: by the numbers

•FN is the larger company ($21.89B vs $10.74B market cap).
•FN trades at the lower earnings multiple (52.49 vs 57.61 P/E).
•POWL converts more revenue to profit (16.51% vs 9.87% net margin).
•POWL grew revenue faster over the past five years (19.84% vs 18.99% CAGR).
•POWL pays a dividend (0.12% yield) while FN does not currently pay one.

Which is better, FN or POWL?

Metric tally: FN 3 · POWL 12

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueFN(lower P/E)

GrowthPOWL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityPOWL(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	FN	POWL
P/E ratio	52.49●	57.61
Forward P/E	44.26	44.88
P/S ratio	5.23●	9.51
P/B ratio	9.60●	15.19
PEG ratio	2.47	1.03●
EV / EBITDA	42.67	41.17●
FCF yield	0.21%	1.79%●

Profitability

Metric	FN	POWL
Gross margin	11.96%	30.10%●
Operating margin	9.78%	19.76%●
Net margin	9.87%	16.51%●
ROE	18.14%	26.36%●
ROIC	15.01%	25.41%●

Dividends

Metric	FN	POWL
Dividend yield	—	0.12%
Payout ratio	—	7.18%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FN	POWL
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	18.99%	19.84%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	24.62%	59.98%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-9.50%	34.56%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	45.36%	99.30%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, FN or POWL?: It depends on your goal. value: FN (lower P/E); growth: POWL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: POWL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, POWL leads 12 to 3.
Is FN or POWL cheaper?: On trailing earnings, FN is cheaper: FN trades at a 52.49 P/E and POWL at 57.61.
Which has grown faster, FN or POWL?: Over the past five years, POWL grew revenue faster — FN at a 18.99% CAGR versus POWL at 19.84%.
Does FN or POWL pay a bigger dividend?: POWL pays a dividend (0.12% yield) while FN does not currently pay one.
Is FN or POWL more profitable?: POWL runs the higher net margin — FN at 9.87% versus POWL at 16.51%.
Which has been the better investment, FN or POWL?: Over the past 10-year, POWL delivered the higher annualized total return — FN at 32.51% versus POWL at 47.08%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FN analysis Full POWL analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Fabrinet P/E ratio Powell Industries P/E ratio Fabrinet dividend yield Powell Industries dividend yield Fabrinet ROE Powell Industries ROE Fabrinet operating margin Powell Industries operating margin Fabrinet revenue growth Powell Industries revenue growth Fabrinet free cash flow Powell Industries free cash flow

Fabrinet & Powell Industries appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.