Is FN or OKTA cheaper?

On trailing earnings, FN is cheaper: FN trades at a 52.49 P/E and OKTA at 84.27.

Which has grown faster, FN or OKTA?

Over the past five years, OKTA grew revenue faster — FN at a 18.99% CAGR versus OKTA at 27.10%.

Is FN or OKTA more profitable?

FN runs the higher net margin — FN at 9.87% versus OKTA at 8.24%.

Which has been the better investment, FN or OKTA?

Over the past 5-year, FN delivered the higher annualized total return — FN at 32.51% versus OKTA at -12.47%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Fabrinet (FN) vs Okta, Inc. (OKTA)

FN leads on 8 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Fabrinet and Okta, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — FN vs OKTA

growth of $100 · last 9y

FN +1450.8%OKTA +394.6%FN compounded faster

FN OKTA

FN vs OKTA: by the numbers

•FN is the larger company ($21.89B vs $19.32B market cap).
•FN trades at the lower earnings multiple (52.49 vs 84.27 P/E).
•FN converts more revenue to profit (9.87% vs 8.24% net margin).
•OKTA grew revenue faster over the past five years (27.10% vs 18.99% CAGR).

Which is better, FN or OKTA?

Metric tally: FN 8 · OKTA 7

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueFN(lower P/E)

GrowthOKTA(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityFN(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	FN	OKTA
P/E ratio	52.49●	84.27
Forward P/E	44.26	27.25●
P/S ratio	5.23●	6.90
P/B ratio	9.60	3.00●
PEG ratio	2.47	0.09●
EV / EBITDA	42.67●	56.43
FCF yield	0.21%	4.54%●

Profitability

Metric	FN	OKTA
Gross margin	11.96%	77.44%●
Operating margin	9.78%●	5.67%
Net margin	9.87%●	8.24%
ROE	18.14%●	3.58%
ROIC	15.01%●	1.88%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FN	OKTA
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	18.99%	27.10%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	24.62%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	-9.50%	47.69%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	45.36%●	-12.47%

Frequently asked

Which is better, FN or OKTA?: It depends on your goal. value: FN (lower P/E); growth: OKTA (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: FN (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, FN leads 8 to 7.
Is FN or OKTA cheaper?: On trailing earnings, FN is cheaper: FN trades at a 52.49 P/E and OKTA at 84.27.
Which has grown faster, FN or OKTA?: Over the past five years, OKTA grew revenue faster — FN at a 18.99% CAGR versus OKTA at 27.10%.
Is FN or OKTA more profitable?: FN runs the higher net margin — FN at 9.87% versus OKTA at 8.24%.
Which has been the better investment, FN or OKTA?: Over the past 5-year, FN delivered the higher annualized total return — FN at 32.51% versus OKTA at -12.47%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FN analysis Full OKTA analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Fabrinet P/E ratio Okta P/E ratio Fabrinet dividend yield Okta dividend yield Fabrinet ROE Okta ROE Fabrinet operating margin Okta operating margin Fabrinet revenue growth Okta revenue growth Fabrinet free cash flow Okta free cash flow

Fabrinet & Okta appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.