Which has grown faster, FLUT or LULU?

Over the past five years, FLUT grew revenue faster — FLUT at a 22.11% CAGR versus LULU at 17.61%.

Is FLUT or LULU more profitable?

LULU runs the higher net margin — FLUT at -2.91% versus LULU at 13.03%.

Which has been the better investment, FLUT or LULU?

Over the past 10-year, LULU delivered the higher annualized total return — FLUT at -0.74% versus LULU at 5.35%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Flutter Entertainment plc (FLUT) vs Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU)

LULU leads on 10 of 14 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Flutter Entertainment plc and Lululemon Athletica Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

FLUT

Flutter Entertainment plc

$19.19B

$110.65Consumer Cyclical

LULU

Lululemon Athletica Inc.

$13.49B

$118.77Consumer Cyclical

Total return — FLUT vs LULU

growth of $100 · last 19y

FLUT +234.3%LULU +748.4%LULU compounded faster

FLUT LULU

FLUT vs LULU: by the numbers

•FLUT is the larger company ($19.19B vs $13.49B market cap).
•LULU is profitable (13.03% net margin) while FLUT runs a net loss (-2.91%).
•FLUT grew revenue faster over the past five years (22.11% vs 17.61% CAGR).

Which is better, FLUT or LULU?

Metric tally: FLUT 4 · LULU 10

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthFLUT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityLULU(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	FLUT	LULU
P/E ratio	—	9.62
Forward P/E	13.35	10.71●
P/S ratio	1.16●	1.22
P/B ratio	2.19●	2.84
PEG ratio	—	0.40
EV / EBITDA	14.09	5.81●
FCF yield	3.68%	9.33%●

Profitability

Metric	FLUT	LULU
Gross margin	44.25%	55.70%●
Operating margin	2.40%	18.21%●
Net margin	-2.91%	13.03%●
ROE	-5.47%	30.25%●
ROIC	2.26%	22.70%●

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FLUT	LULU
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	22.11%●	17.61%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-36.84%	24.02%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	0.14%	7.36%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-10.38%●	-18.88%

Frequently asked

Which is better, FLUT or LULU?: It depends on your goal. growth: FLUT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: LULU (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, LULU leads 10 to 4.
Which has grown faster, FLUT or LULU?: Over the past five years, FLUT grew revenue faster — FLUT at a 22.11% CAGR versus LULU at 17.61%.
Is FLUT or LULU more profitable?: LULU runs the higher net margin — FLUT at -2.91% versus LULU at 13.03%.
Which has been the better investment, FLUT or LULU?: Over the past 10-year, LULU delivered the higher annualized total return — FLUT at -0.74% versus LULU at 5.35%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FLUT analysis Full LULU analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Flutter Entertainment P/E ratio Lululemon Athletica P/E ratio Flutter Entertainment dividend yield Lululemon Athletica dividend yield Flutter Entertainment ROE Lululemon Athletica ROE Flutter Entertainment operating margin Lululemon Athletica operating margin Flutter Entertainment revenue growth Lululemon Athletica revenue growth Flutter Entertainment free cash flow Lululemon Athletica free cash flow

Flutter Entertainment & Lululemon Athletica appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.