Fluor Corporation (FLR) vs Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO)
SIMO leads on 11 of 13 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Fluor Corporation and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
FLR
Fluor Corporation
$52.19IndustrialsAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
SIMO
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation
$270.90TechnologyAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — FLR vs SIMO
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 21yFLR +121.8%SIMO +3536.4%SIMO compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
FLR SIMO
FLR vs SIMO: by the numbers
- •SIMO is the larger company ($9.09B vs $7.29B market cap).
- •SIMO trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.10 vs 26.49 P/E).
- •SIMO converts more revenue to profit (16.02% vs 2.30% net margin).
- •SIMO grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.49% vs 1.92% CAGR).
- •SIMO pays a dividend (0.74% yield) while FLR does not currently pay one.
Which is better, FLR or SIMO?
Metric tally: FLR 2 · SIMO 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSIMO(lower P/E)
GrowthSIMO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualitySIMO(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | FLR | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 26.49 | 21.10● |
| Forward P/E | 20.19● | 30.51 |
| P/S ratio | 0.60● | 2.57 |
| P/B ratio | 3.20 | 2.74● |
| PEG ratio | 1.25 | 0.17● |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 16.83 |
| FCF yield | — | 0.28% |
Profitability
| Metric | FLR | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | -1.63% | 48.09%● |
| Operating margin | -3.40% | 12.77%● |
| Net margin | 2.30% | 16.02%● |
| ROE | 12.19% | 18.76%● |
| ROIC | 1.84% | 9.22%● |
Dividends
| Metric | FLR | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 0.74% |
| Payout ratio | — | 13.70% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FLR | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 1.92% | 12.49%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 40.81% | 44.85%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | — | -42.15% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 26.15% | 37.15%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, FLR or SIMO?
- It depends on your goal. value: SIMO (lower P/E); growth: SIMO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: SIMO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SIMO leads 11 to 2.
- Is FLR or SIMO cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, SIMO is cheaper: FLR trades at a 26.49 P/E and SIMO at 21.10.
- Which has grown faster, FLR or SIMO?
- Over the past five years, SIMO grew revenue faster — FLR at a 1.92% CAGR versus SIMO at 12.49%.
- Does FLR or SIMO pay a bigger dividend?
- SIMO pays a dividend (0.74% yield) while FLR does not currently pay one.
- Is FLR or SIMO more profitable?
- SIMO runs the higher net margin — FLR at 2.30% versus SIMO at 16.02%.
- Which has been the better investment, FLR or SIMO?
- Over the past 10-year, SIMO delivered the higher annualized total return — FLR at 0.78% versus SIMO at 20.85%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Fluor P/E ratioSilicon Motion Technology P/E ratioFluor dividend yieldSilicon Motion Technology dividend yieldFluor ROESilicon Motion Technology ROEFluor operating marginSilicon Motion Technology operating marginFluor revenue growthSilicon Motion Technology revenue growthFluor free cash flowSilicon Motion Technology free cash flow
Fluor & Silicon Motion Technology appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 25, 2026.