Which has grown faster, FICO or SATS?

Over the past five years, SATS grew revenue faster — FICO at a 11.12% CAGR versus SATS at 50.70%.

Is FICO or SATS more profitable?

FICO runs the higher net margin — FICO at 33.67% versus SATS at -97.56%.

Which has been the better investment, FICO or SATS?

Over the past 10-year, FICO delivered the higher annualized total return — FICO at 27.08% versus SATS at 9.74%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) vs EchoStar Corporation (SATS)

FICO leads on 9 of 12 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Fair Isaac Corporation and EchoStar Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 26, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

FICO

Fair Isaac Corporation

Total return — FICO vs SATS

growth of $100 · last 18y

FICO +3710.2%SATS +198.6%FICO compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

FICO SATS

FICO vs SATS: by the numbers

•SATS is the larger company ($27.95B vs $27.81B market cap).
•FICO is profitable (33.67% net margin) while SATS runs a net loss (-97.56%).
•SATS grew revenue faster over the past five years (50.70% vs 11.12% CAGR).

Which is better, FICO or SATS?

Metric tally: FICO 9 · SATS 3

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthSATS(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityFICO(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	FICO	SATS
P/E ratio	36.22	—
Forward P/E	21.08●	26.37
P/S ratio	12.04	1.90●
P/B ratio	—	4.99
PEG ratio	1.89	—
EV / EBITDA	26.55●	35.32
FCF yield	3.29%	—

Profitability

Metric	FICO	SATS
Gross margin	84.16%●	27.08%
Operating margin	50.37%●	2.19%
Net margin	33.67%●	-97.56%
ROE	-37.34%●	-256.45%
ROIC	52.96%●	-0.18%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FICO	SATS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	11.12%	50.70%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	27.04%●	-12.41%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	14.11%●	5.55%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	19.04%	29.64%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, FICO or SATS?: It depends on your goal. growth: SATS (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: FICO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, FICO leads 9 to 3.
Which has grown faster, FICO or SATS?: Over the past five years, SATS grew revenue faster — FICO at a 11.12% CAGR versus SATS at 50.70%.
Is FICO or SATS more profitable?: FICO runs the higher net margin — FICO at 33.67% versus SATS at -97.56%.
Which has been the better investment, FICO or SATS?: Over the past 10-year, FICO delivered the higher annualized total return — FICO at 27.08% versus SATS at 9.74%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FICO analysis Full SATS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Fair Isaac P/E ratio EchoStar P/E ratio Fair Isaac dividend yield EchoStar dividend yield Fair Isaac ROE EchoStar ROE Fair Isaac operating margin EchoStar operating margin Fair Isaac revenue growth EchoStar revenue growth Fair Isaac free cash flow EchoStar free cash flow

Fair Isaac & EchoStar appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 26, 2026.