Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) vs NetApp, Inc. (NTAP)
FICO leads on 8 of 15 compared metrics, though NTAP is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Fair Isaac Corporation and NetApp, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 26, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — FICO vs NTAP
growth of $100 · last 30yFICO +8810.1%NTAP +8229.6%FICO compounded faster
FICO NTAP
FICO vs NTAP: by the numbers
- •NTAP is the larger company ($29.50B vs $27.81B market cap).
- •NTAP trades at the lower earnings multiple (24.31 vs 36.22 P/E).
- •FICO converts more revenue to profit (33.67% vs 18.43% net margin).
- •FICO grew revenue faster over the past five years (11.12% vs 4.18% CAGR).
- •NTAP pays a dividend (1.35% yield) while FICO does not currently pay one.
Which is better, FICO or NTAP?
Metric tally: FICO 8 · NTAP 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueNTAP(lower P/E)
GrowthFICO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityFICO(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | FICO | NTAP |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 36.22 | 24.31● |
| Forward P/E | 21.08 | 19.37● |
| P/S ratio | 12.04 | 4.44● |
| P/B ratio | — | 22.77 |
| PEG ratio | 1.89 | 1.58● |
| EV / EBITDA | 26.55 | 16.81● |
| FCF yield | 3.29% | 6.08%● |
Profitability
| Metric | FICO | NTAP |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 84.16%● | 70.74% |
| Operating margin | 50.37%● | 24.12% |
| Net margin | 33.67%● | 18.43% |
| ROE | -37.34% | 94.45%● |
| ROIC | 52.96%● | 19.40% |
Dividends
| Metric | FICO | NTAP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 1.35% |
| Payout ratio | — | 32.35% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FICO | NTAP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 11.12%● | 4.18% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 27.04%● | 10.39% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 14.11%● | 12.50% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 19.04%● | 15.49% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, FICO or NTAP?
- It depends on your goal. value: NTAP (lower P/E); growth: FICO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: FICO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, FICO leads 8 to 7.
- Is FICO or NTAP cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, NTAP is cheaper: FICO trades at a 36.22 P/E and NTAP at 24.31.
- Which has grown faster, FICO or NTAP?
- Over the past five years, FICO grew revenue faster — FICO at a 11.12% CAGR versus NTAP at 4.18%.
- Does FICO or NTAP pay a bigger dividend?
- NTAP pays a dividend (1.35% yield) while FICO does not currently pay one.
- Is FICO or NTAP more profitable?
- FICO runs the higher net margin — FICO at 33.67% versus NTAP at 18.43%.
- Which has been the better investment, FICO or NTAP?
- Over the past 10-year, FICO delivered the higher annualized total return — FICO at 27.08% versus NTAP at 22.84%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Fair Isaac P/E ratioNetApp P/E ratioFair Isaac dividend yieldNetApp dividend yieldFair Isaac ROENetApp ROEFair Isaac operating marginNetApp operating marginFair Isaac revenue growthNetApp revenue growthFair Isaac free cash flowNetApp free cash flow
Fair Isaac & NetApp appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 26, 2026.