Fiserv, Inc. (FI) vs NetApp, Inc. (NTAP)
FI leads on 11 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Fiserv, Inc. and NetApp, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 13, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — FI vs NTAP
growth of $100 · last 29yFI +2583.4%NTAP +5379.9%NTAP compounded faster
FI NTAP
FI vs NTAP: by the numbers
- •FI is the larger company ($34.31B vs $31.66B market cap).
- •FI trades at the lower earnings multiple (10.16 vs 25.41 P/E).
- •NTAP converts more revenue to profit (18.43% vs 15.17% net margin).
- •FI grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.29% vs 4.18% CAGR).
- •NTAP pays a dividend (1.29% yield) while FI does not currently pay one.
Which is better, FI or NTAP?
Metric tally: FI 11 · NTAP 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueFI(lower P/E)
GrowthFI(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityNTAP(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | FI | NTAP |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 10.16● | 25.41 |
| Forward P/E | 7.69● | 20.24 |
| P/S ratio | 1.68● | 4.64 |
| P/B ratio | 1.42● | 23.80 |
| PEG ratio | 0.60● | 1.57 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.32● | 16.77 |
| FCF yield | 16.67%● | 5.81% |
Profitability
| Metric | FI | NTAP |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 30.86% | 70.74%● |
| Operating margin | 25.32%● | 24.12% |
| Net margin | 15.17% | 18.43%● |
| ROE | 12.20% | 94.45%● |
| ROIC | 10.12% | 19.40%● |
Dividends
| Metric | FI | NTAP |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | — | 1.29% |
| Payout ratio | — | 32.35% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FI | NTAP |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 7.29%● | 4.18% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 34.70%● | 10.39% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 13.82%● | 12.50% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -11.04% | 16.84%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, FI or NTAP?
- It depends on your goal. value: FI (lower P/E); growth: FI (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: NTAP (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, FI leads 11 to 5.
- Is FI or NTAP cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, FI is cheaper: FI trades at a 10.16 P/E and NTAP at 25.41.
- Which has grown faster, FI or NTAP?
- Over the past five years, FI grew revenue faster — FI at a 7.29% CAGR versus NTAP at 4.18%.
- Does FI or NTAP pay a bigger dividend?
- NTAP pays a dividend (1.29% yield) while FI does not currently pay one.
- Is FI or NTAP more profitable?
- NTAP runs the higher net margin — FI at 15.17% versus NTAP at 18.43%.
- Which has been the better investment, FI or NTAP?
- Over the past 10-year, NTAP delivered the higher annualized total return — FI at 3.34% versus NTAP at 23.82%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Fiserv P/E ratioNetApp P/E ratioFiserv dividend yieldNetApp dividend yieldFiserv ROENetApp ROEFiserv operating marginNetApp operating marginFiserv revenue growthNetApp revenue growthFiserv free cash flowNetApp free cash flow
Fiserv & NetApp appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 13, 2026.