Which has the lower trailing P/E, FER or TRI?

TRI has the lower trailing P/E: FER trades at 45.88 and TRI at 28.40. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, FER or TRI?

Over the past five years, FER grew revenue faster — FER at a 7.22% CAGR versus TRI at 4.88%.

Does FER or TRI pay a bigger dividend?

FER yields 2.20% and TRI yields 3.71% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is FER or TRI more profitable?

TRI runs the higher net margin — FER at 6.73% versus TRI at 21.22%.

How have FER and TRI total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, FER delivered 13.07% and TRI delivered 10.56% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Ferrovial SE (FER) vs Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI)

A side-by-side comparison of Ferrovial SE and Thomson Reuters Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 29, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

FER

Ferrovial SE

$42.60B

$58.73IndustrialsAt close: Aug 28, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

TRI

Thomson Reuters Corporation

$46.37B

$106.23IndustrialsAt close: Aug 28, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — FER vs TRI

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

FER +249.8% (+13.3%/yr)TRI +172.1% (+10.5%/yr)FER compounded faster over this window

FER TRI

FER vs TRI: by the numbers

•TRI is the larger company ($46.37B vs $42.60B market cap).
•TRI trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (28.40 vs 45.88 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•TRI converts more revenue to profit (21.22% vs 6.73% net margin).
•FER grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.22% vs 4.88% CAGR).
•TRI pays the higher dividend yield (3.71% vs 2.20%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	FER	TRI
P/E ratio	45.88	28.40
Forward P/E	59.02	23.73
P/S ratio	2.51	5.95
P/B ratio	6.47	4.19
EV / EBITDA	20.92	15.68
FCF yield	3.97%	4.76%

Profitability

Metric	FER	TRI
Gross margin	24.87%	75.80%
Operating margin	10.04%	27.64%
Net margin	6.73%	21.22%
ROE	17.37%	14.96%
ROIC	6.80%	11.04%

Dividends

Metric	FER	TRI
Dividend yield	2.20%	3.71%
Payout ratio	88.69%	116.05%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	FER	TRI
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	7.22%	4.88%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	25.63%	7.22%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	7.04%	9.45%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	17.94%	-0.75%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, FER or TRI?: TRI has the lower trailing P/E: FER trades at 45.88 and TRI at 28.40. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, FER or TRI?: Over the past five years, FER grew revenue faster — FER at a 7.22% CAGR versus TRI at 4.88%.
Does FER or TRI pay a bigger dividend?: FER yields 2.20% and TRI yields 3.71% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is FER or TRI more profitable?: TRI runs the higher net margin — FER at 6.73% versus TRI at 21.22%.
How have FER and TRI total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, FER delivered 13.07% and TRI delivered 10.56% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full FER analysis Full TRI analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Ferrovial SE P/E ratio Thomson Reuters P/E ratio Ferrovial SE dividend yield Thomson Reuters dividend yield Ferrovial SE ROE Thomson Reuters ROE Ferrovial SE operating margin Thomson Reuters operating margin Ferrovial SE revenue growth Thomson Reuters revenue growth Ferrovial SE free cash flow Thomson Reuters free cash flow

Ferrovial SE & Thomson Reuters appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks 25+ Year Dividend Growers Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 29, 2026.