Ferrovial SE (FER) vs Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI)
TRI leads on 10 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Ferrovial SE and Thomson Reuters Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
FER
Ferrovial SE
$64.06IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 15, 2026, 10:55 AM EDT
TRI
Thomson Reuters Corporation
$97.30IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 15, 2026, 10:55 AM EDT
Total return — FER vs TRI
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 14yFER +695.7%TRI +280.8%FER compounded faster
FER TRI
FER vs TRI: by the numbers
- •FER is the larger company ($46.17B vs $42.48B market cap).
- •TRI trades at the lower earnings multiple (26.82 vs 60.21 P/E).
- •TRI converts more revenue to profit (19.93% vs 8.85% net margin).
- •FER grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.70% vs 4.86% CAGR).
- •TRI pays the higher dividend yield (4.30% vs 2.03%).
Which is better, FER or TRI?
Metric tally: FER 7 · TRI 10It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueTRI(lower P/E)
GrowthFER(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeTRI(higher dividend yield)
QualityTRI(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | FER | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 60.21 | 26.82● |
| Forward P/E | 64.89 | 21.18● |
| P/S ratio | 4.06● | 5.24 |
| P/B ratio | 6.61 | 3.39● |
| PEG ratio | 4.82 | 3.72● |
| EV / EBITDA | 38.35 | 14.11● |
| FCF yield | 3.25% | 5.21%● |
Profitability
| Metric | FER | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 93.70%● | 75.81% |
| Operating margin | 10.36% | 26.66%● |
| Net margin | 8.85% | 19.93%● |
| ROE | 14.38%● | 12.89% |
| ROIC | 5.32% | 10.13%● |
Dividends
| Metric | FER | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.03% | 4.30%● |
| Payout ratio | 91.65% | 116.05% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FER | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.70%● | 4.86% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 12.48%● | 7.22% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 11.35%● | 9.45% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 18.57%● | -1.13% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, FER or TRI?
- It depends on your goal. value: TRI (lower P/E); growth: FER (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: TRI (higher dividend yield); quality: TRI (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TRI leads 10 to 7.
- Is FER or TRI cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, TRI is cheaper: FER trades at a 60.21 P/E and TRI at 26.82.
- Which has grown faster, FER or TRI?
- Over the past five years, FER grew revenue faster — FER at a 8.70% CAGR versus TRI at 4.86%.
- Does FER or TRI pay a bigger dividend?
- FER yields 2.03% and TRI yields 4.30% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is FER or TRI more profitable?
- TRI runs the higher net margin — FER at 8.85% versus TRI at 19.93%.
- Which has been the better investment, FER or TRI?
- Over the past 10-year, FER delivered the higher annualized total return — FER at 14.02% versus TRI at 8.55%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Ferrovial SE P/E ratioThomson Reuters P/E ratioFerrovial SE dividend yieldThomson Reuters dividend yieldFerrovial SE ROEThomson Reuters ROEFerrovial SE operating marginThomson Reuters operating marginFerrovial SE revenue growthThomson Reuters revenue growthFerrovial SE free cash flowThomson Reuters free cash flow
Ferrovial SE & Thomson Reuters appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 15, 2026.