Ferrovial SE (FER) vs Rockwell Automation, Inc. (ROK)
FER leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics, though ROK is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of Ferrovial SE and Rockwell Automation, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
FER
Ferrovial SE
$64.06IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 15, 2026, 10:55 AM EDT
ROK
Rockwell Automation, Inc.
$462.53IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 15, 2026, 10:55 AM EDT
Total return — FER vs ROK
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 14yFER +695.7%ROK +767.9%ROK compounded faster
FER ROK
FER vs ROK: by the numbers
- •ROK is the larger company ($51.47B vs $46.17B market cap).
- •ROK trades at the lower earnings multiple (48.83 vs 60.21 P/E).
- •ROK converts more revenue to profit (12.36% vs 8.85% net margin).
- •FER grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.70% vs 6.91% CAGR).
- •FER pays the higher dividend yield (2.03% vs 1.16%).
Which is better, FER or ROK?
Metric tally: FER 9 · ROK 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueROK(lower P/E)
GrowthFER(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeFER(higher dividend yield)
QualityROK(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | FER | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 60.21 | 48.83● |
| Forward P/E | 64.89 | 36.06● |
| P/S ratio | 4.06● | 6.01 |
| P/B ratio | 6.61● | 15.02 |
| PEG ratio | 4.82 | — |
| EV / EBITDA | 38.35 | 28.21● |
| FCF yield | 3.25%● | 2.53% |
Profitability
| Metric | FER | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 93.70%● | 52.53% |
| Operating margin | 10.36% | 19.08%● |
| Net margin | 8.85% | 12.36%● |
| ROE | 14.38% | 30.89%● |
| ROIC | 5.32% | 13.71%● |
Dividends
| Metric | FER | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.03%● | 1.16% |
| Payout ratio | 91.65% | 70.87% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FER | ROK |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.70%● | 6.91% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 12.48%● | -2.73% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 11.35%● | 2.95% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 18.57%● | 11.84% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, FER or ROK?
- It depends on your goal. value: ROK (lower P/E); growth: FER (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: FER (higher dividend yield); quality: ROK (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, FER leads 9 to 7.
- Is FER or ROK cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, ROK is cheaper: FER trades at a 60.21 P/E and ROK at 48.83.
- Which has grown faster, FER or ROK?
- Over the past five years, FER grew revenue faster — FER at a 8.70% CAGR versus ROK at 6.91%.
- Does FER or ROK pay a bigger dividend?
- FER yields 2.03% and ROK yields 1.16% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is FER or ROK more profitable?
- ROK runs the higher net margin — FER at 8.85% versus ROK at 12.36%.
- Which has been the better investment, FER or ROK?
- Over the past 10-year, ROK delivered the higher annualized total return — FER at 14.02% versus ROK at 16.90%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Ferrovial SE P/E ratioRockwell Automation P/E ratioFerrovial SE dividend yieldRockwell Automation dividend yieldFerrovial SE ROERockwell Automation ROEFerrovial SE operating marginRockwell Automation operating marginFerrovial SE revenue growthRockwell Automation revenue growthFerrovial SE free cash flowRockwell Automation free cash flow
Ferrovial SE & Rockwell Automation appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 15, 2026.