FactSet Research Systems Inc. (FDS) vs Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO)
FDS leads on 8 of 14 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of FactSet Research Systems Inc. and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
FDS
FactSet Research Systems Inc.
$254.36Financial ServicesAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
SIMO
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation
$270.90TechnologyAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — FDS vs SIMO
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 21yFDS +798.3%SIMO +3536.4%SIMO compounded faster
FDS SIMO
FDS vs SIMO: by the numbers
- •SIMO is the larger company ($9.09B vs $9.05B market cap).
- •FDS trades at the lower earnings multiple (16.75 vs 21.10 P/E).
- •FDS converts more revenue to profit (23.21% vs 16.02% net margin).
- •SIMO grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.49% vs 9.30% CAGR).
- •FDS pays the higher dividend yield (1.75% vs 0.74%).
Which is better, FDS or SIMO?
Metric tally: FDS 8 · SIMO 6It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueFDS(lower P/E)
GrowthSIMO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeFDS(higher dividend yield)
QualityFDS(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | FDS | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 16.75● | 21.10 |
| Forward P/E | 14.30● | 30.51 |
| P/S ratio | 3.86 | 2.57● |
| P/B ratio | 4.63 | 2.74● |
| PEG ratio | 2.05 | 0.17● |
| EV / EBITDA | — | 16.83 |
| FCF yield | — | 0.28% |
Profitability
| Metric | FDS | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 51.38%● | 48.09% |
| Operating margin | 29.55%● | 12.77% |
| Net margin | 23.21%● | 16.02% |
| ROE | 27.85%● | 18.76% |
| ROIC | 16.24%● | 9.22% |
Dividends
| Metric | FDS | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.75%● | 0.74% |
| Payout ratio | 28.34% | 13.70% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FDS | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 9.30% | 12.49%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 9.87% | 44.85%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | — | -42.15% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | -4.94% | 37.15%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, FDS or SIMO?
- It depends on your goal. value: FDS (lower P/E); growth: SIMO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: FDS (higher dividend yield); quality: FDS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, FDS leads 8 to 6.
- Is FDS or SIMO cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, FDS is cheaper: FDS trades at a 16.75 P/E and SIMO at 21.10.
- Which has grown faster, FDS or SIMO?
- Over the past five years, SIMO grew revenue faster — FDS at a 9.30% CAGR versus SIMO at 12.49%.
- Does FDS or SIMO pay a bigger dividend?
- FDS yields 1.75% and SIMO yields 0.74% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is FDS or SIMO more profitable?
- FDS runs the higher net margin — FDS at 23.21% versus SIMO at 16.02%.
- Which has been the better investment, FDS or SIMO?
- Over the past 10-year, SIMO delivered the higher annualized total return — FDS at 5.25% versus SIMO at 20.85%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
FactSet Research Systems P/E ratioSilicon Motion Technology P/E ratioFactSet Research Systems dividend yieldSilicon Motion Technology dividend yieldFactSet Research Systems ROESilicon Motion Technology ROEFactSet Research Systems operating marginSilicon Motion Technology operating marginFactSet Research Systems revenue growthSilicon Motion Technology revenue growthFactSet Research Systems free cash flowSilicon Motion Technology free cash flow
FactSet Research Systems & Silicon Motion Technology appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 25, 2026.