Fastenal Company (FAST) vs Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI)
TRI leads on 11 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Fastenal Company and Thomson Reuters Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 20, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
FAST
Fastenal Company
$44.76IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
TRI
Thomson Reuters Corporation
$95.43IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 20, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT
Total return — FAST vs TRI
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 24yFAST +2972.7%TRI +393.7%FAST compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
FAST TRI
FAST vs TRI: by the numbers
- •FAST is the larger company ($51.39B vs $41.66B market cap).
- •TRI trades at the lower earnings multiple (28.13 vs 37.93 P/E).
- •TRI converts more revenue to profit (19.93% vs 15.45% net margin).
- •FAST grew revenue faster over the past five years (8.96% vs 4.86% CAGR).
- •TRI pays the higher dividend yield (4.10% vs 2.06%).
Which is better, FAST or TRI?
Metric tally: FAST 6 · TRI 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueTRI(lower P/E)
GrowthFAST(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeTRI(higher dividend yield)
QualityFAST(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | FAST | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 37.93 | 28.13● |
| Forward P/E | 35.46 | 21.92● |
| P/S ratio | 5.88 | 5.50● |
| P/B ratio | 12.65 | 3.55● |
| PEG ratio | 3.65● | 3.90 |
| EV / EBITDA | 27.09 | 14.76● |
| FCF yield | 2.01% | 4.97%● |
Profitability
| Metric | FAST | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 44.70% | 75.81%● |
| Operating margin | 20.29% | 26.66%● |
| Net margin | 15.45% | 19.93%● |
| ROE | 33.23%● | 12.89% |
| ROIC | 28.17%● | 10.13% |
Dividends
| Metric | FAST | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.06% | 4.10%● |
| Payout ratio | 83.64% | 116.05% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FAST | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 8.96%● | 4.86% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 7.96%● | 7.22% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 2.54% | 9.45%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 13.26%● | -0.42% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, FAST or TRI?
- It depends on your goal. value: TRI (lower P/E); growth: FAST (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: TRI (higher dividend yield); quality: FAST (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TRI leads 11 to 6.
- Is FAST or TRI cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, TRI is cheaper: FAST trades at a 37.93 P/E and TRI at 28.13.
- Which has grown faster, FAST or TRI?
- Over the past five years, FAST grew revenue faster — FAST at a 8.96% CAGR versus TRI at 4.86%.
- Does FAST or TRI pay a bigger dividend?
- FAST yields 2.06% and TRI yields 4.10% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is FAST or TRI more profitable?
- TRI runs the higher net margin — FAST at 15.45% versus TRI at 19.93%.
- Which has been the better investment, FAST or TRI?
- Over the past 10-year, FAST delivered the higher annualized total return — FAST at 18.52% versus TRI at 8.98%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Fastenal P/E ratioThomson Reuters P/E ratioFastenal dividend yieldThomson Reuters dividend yieldFastenal ROEThomson Reuters ROEFastenal operating marginThomson Reuters operating marginFastenal revenue growthThomson Reuters revenue growthFastenal free cash flowThomson Reuters free cash flow
Fastenal & Thomson Reuters appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 20, 2026.