Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG) vs Slb N.V. (SLB)
FANG and SLB are evenly matched — 8 metrics each of 16.
A side-by-side comparison of Diamondback Energy, Inc. and Slb N.V. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 9, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — FANG vs SLB
growth of $100 · last 14yFANG +966.3%SLB -34.3%FANG compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
FANG SLB
FANG vs SLB: by the numbers
- •SLB is the larger company ($70.63B vs $51.20B market cap).
- •SLB trades at the lower earnings multiple (20.89 vs 219.53 P/E).
- •SLB converts more revenue to profit (9.20% vs 2.65% net margin).
- •FANG grew revenue faster over the past five years (37.44% vs 10.96% CAGR).
- •SLB pays the higher dividend yield (2.49% vs 2.36%).
Which is better, FANG or SLB?
Metric tally: FANG 8 · SLB 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSLB(lower P/E)
GrowthFANG(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeSLB(higher dividend yield)
QualitySLB(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | FANG | SLB |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 219.53 | 20.89● |
| Forward P/E | — | 18.54 |
| P/S ratio | 3.47 | 2.00● |
| P/B ratio | 1.45● | 2.75 |
| PEG ratio | 8.63 | 3.25● |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.73● | 10.29 |
| FCF yield | 3.02% | 6.51%● |
Profitability
| Metric | FANG | SLB |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 41.83%● | 17.33% |
| Operating margin | 32.73%● | 14.32% |
| Net margin | 2.65% | 9.20%● |
| ROE | 1.10% | 12.63%● |
| ROIC | 6.00% | 10.34%● |
Dividends
| Metric | FANG | SLB |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 2.36% | 2.49%● |
| Payout ratio | 76.79% | 49.58% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | FANG | SLB |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 37.44%● | 10.96% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 25.44%● | 6.42% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 91.40%● | 23.49% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 21.23%● | 11.64% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, FANG or SLB?
- It depends on your goal. value: SLB (lower P/E); growth: FANG (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: SLB (higher dividend yield); quality: SLB (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
- Is FANG or SLB cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, SLB is cheaper: FANG trades at a 219.53 P/E and SLB at 20.89.
- Which has grown faster, FANG or SLB?
- Over the past five years, FANG grew revenue faster — FANG at a 37.44% CAGR versus SLB at 10.96%.
- Does FANG or SLB pay a bigger dividend?
- FANG yields 2.36% and SLB yields 2.49% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is FANG or SLB more profitable?
- SLB runs the higher net margin — FANG at 2.65% versus SLB at 9.20%.
- Which has been the better investment, FANG or SLB?
- Over the past 10-year, FANG delivered the higher annualized total return — FANG at 10.60% versus SLB at -2.22%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Diamondback Energy P/E ratioSlb P/E ratioDiamondback Energy dividend yieldSlb dividend yieldDiamondback Energy ROESlb ROEDiamondback Energy operating marginSlb operating marginDiamondback Energy revenue growthSlb revenue growthDiamondback Energy free cash flowSlb free cash flow
Diamondback Energy & Slb appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 9, 2026.