Is EXPE or RL cheaper?

On trailing earnings, EXPE is cheaper: EXPE trades at a 21.20 P/E and RL at 27.33.

Which has grown faster, EXPE or RL?

Over the past five years, EXPE grew revenue faster — EXPE at a 29.07% CAGR versus RL at 13.01%.

Does EXPE or RL pay a bigger dividend?

EXPE yields 0.73% and RL yields 0.88% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is EXPE or RL more profitable?

RL runs the higher net margin — EXPE at 9.81% versus RL at 11.60%.

Which has been the better investment, EXPE or RL?

Over the past 10-year, RL delivered the higher annualized total return — EXPE at 9.30% versus RL at 18.05%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Expedia Group, Inc. (EXPE) vs Ralph Lauren Corporation (RL)

EXPE leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Expedia Group, Inc. and Ralph Lauren Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 21, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

EXPE

Expedia Group, Inc.

$27.58B

$240.90Consumer Cyclical

Ralph Lauren Corporation

$25.19B

$413.01Consumer Cyclical

Total return — EXPE vs RL

growth of $100 · last 21y

EXPE +924.7%RL +751.6%EXPE compounded faster

EXPE RL

EXPE vs RL: by the numbers

•EXPE is the larger company ($27.58B vs $25.19B market cap).
•EXPE trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.20 vs 27.33 P/E).
•RL converts more revenue to profit (11.60% vs 9.81% net margin).
•EXPE grew revenue faster over the past five years (29.07% vs 13.01% CAGR).
•RL pays the higher dividend yield (0.88% vs 0.73%).

Which is better, EXPE or RL?

Metric tally: EXPE 9 · RL 8

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueEXPE(lower P/E)

GrowthEXPE(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeRL(higher dividend yield)

QualityRL(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	EXPE	RL
P/E ratio	21.20●	27.33
Forward P/E	10.43●	22.52
P/S ratio	1.93●	3.17
P/B ratio	50.95	9.06●
PEG ratio	2.77	0.71●
EV / EBITDA	8.52●	18.95
FCF yield	15.97%●	2.90%

Profitability

Metric	EXPE	RL
Gross margin	90.27%●	69.87%
Operating margin	16.15%●	14.53%
Net margin	9.81%	11.60%●
ROE	258.33%●	33.13%
ROIC	18.64%	19.62%●

Dividends

Metric	EXPE	RL
Dividend yield	0.73%	0.88%●
Payout ratio	17.05%	23.67%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	EXPE	RL
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	29.07%●	13.01%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	17.91%	20.37%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	18.68%	22.25%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	8.40%	32.21%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, EXPE or RL?: It depends on your goal. value: EXPE (lower P/E); growth: EXPE (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: RL (higher dividend yield); quality: RL (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, EXPE leads 9 to 8.
Is EXPE or RL cheaper?: On trailing earnings, EXPE is cheaper: EXPE trades at a 21.20 P/E and RL at 27.33.
Which has grown faster, EXPE or RL?: Over the past five years, EXPE grew revenue faster — EXPE at a 29.07% CAGR versus RL at 13.01%.
Does EXPE or RL pay a bigger dividend?: EXPE yields 0.73% and RL yields 0.88% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is EXPE or RL more profitable?: RL runs the higher net margin — EXPE at 9.81% versus RL at 11.60%.
Which has been the better investment, EXPE or RL?: Over the past 10-year, RL delivered the higher annualized total return — EXPE at 9.30% versus RL at 18.05%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full EXPE analysis Full RL analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Expedia P/E ratio Ralph Lauren P/E ratio Expedia dividend yield Ralph Lauren dividend yield Expedia ROE Ralph Lauren ROE Expedia operating margin Ralph Lauren operating margin Expedia revenue growth Ralph Lauren revenue growth Expedia free cash flow Ralph Lauren free cash flow

Expedia & Ralph Lauren appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 21, 2026.