Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. (EXPD) vs Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. (STRL)
EXPD and STRL are evenly matched — 8 metrics each of 16.
A side-by-side comparison of Expeditors International of Washington, Inc. and Sterling Infrastructure, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 2, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
EXPD
Expeditors International of Washington, Inc.
$167.57Industrials
STRL
Sterling Infrastructure, Inc.
$700.75Industrials
Total return — EXPD vs STRL
growth of $100 · last 30yEXPD +8629.8%STRL +58720.2%STRL compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
EXPD STRL
EXPD vs STRL: by the numbers
- •EXPD is the larger company ($21.92B vs $21.50B market cap).
- •EXPD trades at the lower earnings multiple (26.99 vs 69.46 P/E).
- •STRL converts more revenue to profit (12.02% vs 7.48% net margin).
- •STRL grew revenue faster over the past five years (14.81% vs 0.10% CAGR).
- •EXPD pays a dividend (0.97% yield) while STRL does not currently pay one.
Which is better, EXPD or STRL?
Metric tally: EXPD 8 · STRL 8It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueEXPD(lower P/E)
GrowthSTRL(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
QualityEXPD(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | EXPD | STRL |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 26.99● | 69.46 |
| Forward P/E | 24.55● | 32.28 |
| P/S ratio | 2.00● | 8.36 |
| P/B ratio | 9.79● | 20.26 |
| PEG ratio | 6.52 | 2.34● |
| EV / EBITDA | 19.00● | 41.21 |
| FCF yield | 4.12%● | 1.83% |
Profitability
| Metric | EXPD | STRL |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 20.23% | 23.29%● |
| Operating margin | 9.67% | 17.25%● |
| Net margin | 7.48% | 12.02%● |
| ROE | 36.62%● | 29.14% |
| ROIC | 26.65%● | 19.06% |
Dividends
| Metric | EXPD | STRL |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.97% | — |
| Payout ratio | 27.14% | — |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | EXPD | STRL |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 0.10% | 14.81%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 7.60% | 44.28%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 2.95% | 31.85%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 6.66% | 96.72%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, EXPD or STRL?
- It depends on your goal. value: EXPD (lower P/E); growth: STRL (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: EXPD (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, they are evenly matched.
- Is EXPD or STRL cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, EXPD is cheaper: EXPD trades at a 26.99 P/E and STRL at 69.46.
- Which has grown faster, EXPD or STRL?
- Over the past five years, STRL grew revenue faster — EXPD at a 0.10% CAGR versus STRL at 14.81%.
- Does EXPD or STRL pay a bigger dividend?
- EXPD pays a dividend (0.97% yield) while STRL does not currently pay one.
- Is EXPD or STRL more profitable?
- STRL runs the higher net margin — EXPD at 7.48% versus STRL at 12.02%.
- Which has been the better investment, EXPD or STRL?
- Over the past 10-year, STRL delivered the higher annualized total return — EXPD at 14.26% versus STRL at 63.67%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Expeditors International of Washington P/E ratioSterling Infrastructure P/E ratioExpeditors International of Washington dividend yieldSterling Infrastructure dividend yieldExpeditors International of Washington ROESterling Infrastructure ROEExpeditors International of Washington operating marginSterling Infrastructure operating marginExpeditors International of Washington revenue growthSterling Infrastructure revenue growthExpeditors International of Washington free cash flowSterling Infrastructure free cash flow
Expeditors International of Washington & Sterling Infrastructure appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 2, 2026.