Is ETN or VRT cheaper?

On trailing earnings, ETN is cheaper: ETN trades at a 42.60 P/E and VRT at 89.94.

Which has grown faster, ETN or VRT?

Over the past five years, VRT grew revenue faster — ETN at a 9.94% CAGR versus VRT at 18.86%.

Does ETN or VRT pay a bigger dividend?

ETN yields 0.98% and VRT yields 0.06% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is ETN or VRT more profitable?

VRT runs the higher net margin — ETN at 13.99% versus VRT at 14.37%.

Which has been the better investment, ETN or VRT?

Over the past 5-year, VRT delivered the higher annualized total return — ETN at 24.56% versus VRT at 68.02%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Eaton Corporation plc (ETN) vs Vertiv Holdings Co (VRT)

VRT leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics, though ETN is the cheaper stock.

A side-by-side comparison of Eaton Corporation plc and Vertiv Holdings Co across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 23, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

ETN

Eaton Corporation plc

Total return — ETN vs VRT

growth of $100 · last 8y

ETN +445.7%VRT +3534.1%VRT compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

ETN VRT

ETN vs VRT: by the numbers

•ETN is the larger company ($169.21B vs $137.50B market cap).
•ETN trades at the lower earnings multiple (42.60 vs 89.94 P/E).
•VRT converts more revenue to profit (14.37% vs 13.99% net margin).
•VRT grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.86% vs 9.94% CAGR).
•ETN pays the higher dividend yield (0.98% vs 0.06%).

Which is better, ETN or VRT?

Metric tally: ETN 7 · VRT 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueETN(lower P/E)

GrowthVRT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeETN(higher dividend yield)

QualityVRT(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ETN	VRT
P/E ratio	42.60●	89.94
Forward P/E	27.82●	40.70
P/S ratio	5.95●	12.94
P/B ratio	8.58●	33.07
PEG ratio	3.05	0.28●
EV / EBITDA	30.63●	60.77
FCF yield	2.77%●	1.65%

Profitability

Metric	ETN	VRT
Gross margin	36.89%	36.16%
Operating margin	18.13%	18.54%●
Net margin	13.99%	14.37%●
ROE	20.19%	36.71%●
ROIC	13.14%	18.55%●

Dividends

Metric	ETN	VRT
Dividend yield	0.98%●	0.06%
Payout ratio	40.80%	6.45%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ETN	VRT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	9.94%	18.86%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	24.48%	79.41%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	13.57%	41.85%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	27.00%	68.02%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, ETN or VRT?: It depends on your goal. value: ETN (lower P/E); growth: VRT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: ETN (higher dividend yield); quality: VRT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, VRT leads 9 to 7.
Is ETN or VRT cheaper?: On trailing earnings, ETN is cheaper: ETN trades at a 42.60 P/E and VRT at 89.94.
Which has grown faster, ETN or VRT?: Over the past five years, VRT grew revenue faster — ETN at a 9.94% CAGR versus VRT at 18.86%.
Does ETN or VRT pay a bigger dividend?: ETN yields 0.98% and VRT yields 0.06% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is ETN or VRT more profitable?: VRT runs the higher net margin — ETN at 13.99% versus VRT at 14.37%.
Which has been the better investment, ETN or VRT?: Over the past 5-year, VRT delivered the higher annualized total return — ETN at 24.56% versus VRT at 68.02%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ETN analysis Full VRT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Eaton P/E ratio Vertiv P/E ratio Eaton dividend yield Vertiv dividend yield Eaton ROE Vertiv ROE Eaton operating margin Vertiv operating margin Eaton revenue growth Vertiv revenue growth Eaton free cash flow Vertiv free cash flow

Eaton & Vertiv appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest ROE Stocks Highest ROIC Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 23, 2026.