Which has grown faster, EQT or HP?

Over the past five years, HP grew revenue faster — EQT at a 26.65% CAGR versus HP at 30.24%.

Does EQT or HP pay a bigger dividend?

EQT yields 1.26% and HP yields 2.55% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is EQT or HP more profitable?

EQT runs the higher net margin — EQT at 33.40% versus HP at -9.39%.

Which has been the better investment, EQT or HP?

Over the past 10-year, EQT delivered the higher annualized total return — EQT at 3.28% versus HP at -0.26%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

EQT Corporation (EQT) vs Helmerich & Payne, Inc. (HP)

EQT leads on 11 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of EQT Corporation and Helmerich & Payne, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Helmerich & Payne, Inc.

$3.92B

$39.25Energy

Total return — EQT vs HP

growth of $100 · last 30y

EQT +1231.8%HP +549.8%EQT compounded faster

EQT HP

EQT vs HP: by the numbers

•EQT is the larger company ($32.49B vs $3.92B market cap).
•EQT is profitable (33.40% net margin) while HP runs a net loss (-9.39%).
•HP grew revenue faster over the past five years (30.24% vs 26.65% CAGR).
•HP pays the higher dividend yield (2.55% vs 1.26%).

Which is better, EQT or HP?

Metric tally: EQT 11 · HP 4

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthHP(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeHP(higher dividend yield)

QualityEQT(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	EQT	HP
P/E ratio	9.62	—
Forward P/E	11.09●	24.86
P/S ratio	3.24	0.98●
P/B ratio	1.29●	1.55
PEG ratio	0.03	—
EV / EBITDA	4.97●	11.12
FCF yield	12.50%●	6.53%

Profitability

Metric	EQT	HP
Gross margin	64.05%●	11.29%
Operating margin	46.73%●	-1.85%
Net margin	33.40%●	-9.39%
ROE	13.34%●	-14.86%
ROIC	6.18%●	3.92%

Dividends

Metric	EQT	HP
Dividend yield	1.26%	2.55%●
Payout ratio	19.59%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	EQT	HP
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	26.65%	30.24%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-10.45%	-4.17%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	58.98%●	-2.32%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	19.27%●	7.73%

Frequently asked

Which is better, EQT or HP?: It depends on your goal. growth: HP (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: HP (higher dividend yield); quality: EQT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, EQT leads 11 to 4.
Which has grown faster, EQT or HP?: Over the past five years, HP grew revenue faster — EQT at a 26.65% CAGR versus HP at 30.24%.
Does EQT or HP pay a bigger dividend?: EQT yields 1.26% and HP yields 2.55% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is EQT or HP more profitable?: EQT runs the higher net margin — EQT at 33.40% versus HP at -9.39%.
Which has been the better investment, EQT or HP?: Over the past 10-year, EQT delivered the higher annualized total return — EQT at 3.28% versus HP at -0.26%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full EQT analysis Full HP analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

EQT P/E ratio Helmerich & Payne P/E ratio EQT dividend yield Helmerich & Payne dividend yield EQT ROE Helmerich & Payne ROE EQT operating margin Helmerich & Payne operating margin EQT revenue growth Helmerich & Payne revenue growth EQT free cash flow Helmerich & Payne free cash flow

EQT & Helmerich & Payne appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.