Which has the lower trailing P/E, EQT or FSLR?

EQT has the lower trailing P/E: EQT trades at 11.83 and FSLR at 13.21. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, EQT or FSLR?

Over the past five years, EQT grew revenue faster — EQT at a 20.44% CAGR versus FSLR at 12.62%.

Does EQT or FSLR pay a bigger dividend?

EQT pays a dividend (1.23% yield), while FSLR has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is EQT or FSLR more profitable?

FSLR runs the higher net margin — EQT at 30.68% versus FSLR at 32.47%.

How have EQT and FSLR total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, EQT delivered 4.25% and FSLR delivered 18.94% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

EQT Corporation (EQT) vs First Solar, Inc. (FSLR)

A side-by-side comparison of EQT Corporation and First Solar, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 23, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

EQT

EQT Corporation

$33.60B

$53.72EnergyAt close: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

FSLR

First Solar, Inc.

$23.03B

$214.28EnergyAt close: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — EQT vs FSLR

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

EQT +51.7% (+4.3%/yr)FSLR +468.7% (+19.0%/yr)FSLR compounded faster over this window

EQT FSLR

EQT vs FSLR: by the numbers

•EQT is the larger company ($33.60B vs $23.03B market cap).
•EQT trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (11.83 vs 13.21 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•FSLR converts more revenue to profit (32.47% vs 30.68% net margin).
•EQT grew revenue faster over the past five years (20.44% vs 12.62% CAGR).
•EQT pays a dividend (1.23% yield), while FSLR has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	EQT	FSLR
P/E ratio	11.83	13.21
Forward P/E	12.95	12.30
P/S ratio	3.62	4.29
P/B ratio	1.33	2.24
EV / EBITDA	5.84	9.05
FCF yield	11.21%	6.50%

Profitability

Metric	EQT	FSLR
Gross margin	48.86%	44.02%
Operating margin	34.70%	33.65%
Net margin	30.68%	32.47%
ROE	11.28%	16.92%
ROIC	7.85%	15.30%

Dividends

Metric	EQT	FSLR
Dividend yield	1.23%	N/A
Payout ratio	19.82%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	EQT	FSLR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	20.44%	12.62%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	N/A	30.54%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	157.06%	49.80%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	28.91%	17.77%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, EQT or FSLR?: EQT has the lower trailing P/E: EQT trades at 11.83 and FSLR at 13.21. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, EQT or FSLR?: Over the past five years, EQT grew revenue faster — EQT at a 20.44% CAGR versus FSLR at 12.62%.
Does EQT or FSLR pay a bigger dividend?: EQT pays a dividend (1.23% yield), while FSLR has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is EQT or FSLR more profitable?: FSLR runs the higher net margin — EQT at 30.68% versus FSLR at 32.47%.
How have EQT and FSLR total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, EQT delivered 4.25% and FSLR delivered 18.94% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full EQT analysis Full FSLR analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

EQT P/E ratio First Solar P/E ratio EQT dividend yield EQT ROE First Solar ROE EQT operating margin First Solar operating margin EQT revenue growth First Solar revenue growth EQT free cash flow First Solar free cash flow

EQT & First Solar appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 23, 2026.