Is EQT or FSLR cheaper?

On trailing earnings, EQT is cheaper: EQT trades at a 9.56 P/E and FSLR at 16.06.

Which has grown faster, EQT or FSLR?

Over the past five years, EQT grew revenue faster — EQT at a 26.65% CAGR versus FSLR at 12.69%.

Does EQT or FSLR pay a bigger dividend?

EQT pays a dividend (1.26% yield) while FSLR does not currently pay one.

Is EQT or FSLR more profitable?

EQT runs the higher net margin — EQT at 33.40% versus FSLR at 30.73%.

Which has been the better investment, EQT or FSLR?

Over the past 10-year, FSLR delivered the higher annualized total return — EQT at 3.07% versus FSLR at 18.37%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

EQT Corporation (EQT) vs First Solar, Inc. (FSLR)

EQT leads on 11 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of EQT Corporation and First Solar, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 26, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — EQT vs FSLR

growth of $100 · last 20y

EQT +124.3%FSLR +905.0%FSLR compounded faster

EQT FSLR

EQT vs FSLR: by the numbers

•EQT is the larger company ($32.31B vs $26.72B market cap).
•EQT trades at the lower earnings multiple (9.56 vs 16.06 P/E).
•EQT converts more revenue to profit (33.40% vs 30.73% net margin).
•EQT grew revenue faster over the past five years (26.65% vs 12.69% CAGR).
•EQT pays a dividend (1.26% yield) while FSLR does not currently pay one.

Which is better, EQT or FSLR?

Metric tally: EQT 11 · FSLR 5

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueEQT(lower P/E)

GrowthEQT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityFSLR(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	EQT	FSLR
P/E ratio	9.56●	16.06
Forward P/E	11.09	10.33●
P/S ratio	3.22●	4.94
P/B ratio	1.29●	2.71
PEG ratio	0.03●	1.01
EV / EBITDA	4.94●	10.74
FCF yield	12.58%●	6.23%

Profitability

Metric	EQT	FSLR
Gross margin	64.05%●	41.73%
Operating margin	46.73%●	33.17%
Net margin	33.40%●	30.73%
ROE	13.34%	16.86%●
ROIC	6.18%	14.42%●

Dividends

Metric	EQT	FSLR
Dividend yield	1.26%	—
Payout ratio	19.59%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	EQT	FSLR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	26.65%●	12.69%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	-10.45%	30.54%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	58.98%●	55.54%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	20.20%	23.13%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, EQT or FSLR?: It depends on your goal. value: EQT (lower P/E); growth: EQT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: FSLR (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, EQT leads 11 to 5.
Is EQT or FSLR cheaper?: On trailing earnings, EQT is cheaper: EQT trades at a 9.56 P/E and FSLR at 16.06.
Which has grown faster, EQT or FSLR?: Over the past five years, EQT grew revenue faster — EQT at a 26.65% CAGR versus FSLR at 12.69%.
Does EQT or FSLR pay a bigger dividend?: EQT pays a dividend (1.26% yield) while FSLR does not currently pay one.
Is EQT or FSLR more profitable?: EQT runs the higher net margin — EQT at 33.40% versus FSLR at 30.73%.
Which has been the better investment, EQT or FSLR?: Over the past 10-year, FSLR delivered the higher annualized total return — EQT at 3.07% versus FSLR at 18.37%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full EQT analysis Full FSLR analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

EQT P/E ratio First Solar P/E ratio EQT dividend yield First Solar dividend yield EQT ROE First Solar ROE EQT operating margin First Solar operating margin EQT revenue growth First Solar revenue growth EQT free cash flow First Solar free cash flow

EQT & First Solar appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest Operating Margin Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 26, 2026.