Which has grown faster, EPAC or SMR?

Over the past five years, SMR grew revenue faster — EPAC at a 5.10% CAGR versus SMR at 120.81%.

Does EPAC or SMR pay a bigger dividend?

EPAC pays a dividend (0.12% yield) while SMR does not currently pay one.

Is EPAC or SMR more profitable?

EPAC runs the higher net margin — EPAC at 14.72% versus SMR at -2066.55%.

Which has been the better investment, EPAC or SMR?

Over the past 5-year, EPAC delivered the higher annualized total return — EPAC at 3.86% versus SMR at -5.02%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC) vs NuScale Power Corporation (SMR)

EPAC leads on 7 of 9 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Enerpac Tool Group Corp. and NuScale Power Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 18, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

EPAC

Enerpac Tool Group Corp.

$1.78B

$34.61IndustrialsAt close: Jul 17, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

SMR

NuScale Power Corporation

$2.30B

$7.72IndustrialsAt close: Jul 17, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — EPAC vs SMR

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 6y

EPAC +58.0%SMR -22.4%EPAC compounded faster

EPAC SMR

EPAC vs SMR: by the numbers

•SMR is the larger company ($2.30B vs $1.78B market cap).
•EPAC is profitable (14.72% net margin) while SMR runs a net loss (-2066.55%).
•SMR grew revenue faster over the past five years (120.81% vs 5.10% CAGR).
•EPAC pays a dividend (0.12% yield) while SMR does not currently pay one.

Which is better, EPAC or SMR?

Metric tally: EPAC 7 · SMR 2

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthSMR(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityEPAC(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	EPAC	SMR
P/E ratio	19.55	—
Forward P/E	18.56	—
P/S ratio	2.81●	67.71
P/B ratio	4.21	1.08●
PEG ratio	2.78	—
EV / EBITDA	11.88	—
FCF yield	6.29%	—

Profitability

Metric	EPAC	SMR
Gross margin	49.05%●	36.31%
Operating margin	21.76%●	-2190.57%
Net margin	14.72%●	-2066.55%
ROE	22.01%●	-33.06%
ROIC	15.12%●	-61.76%

Dividends

Metric	EPAC	SMR
Dividend yield	0.12%	—
Payout ratio	2.33%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	EPAC	SMR
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.10%	120.81%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	169.53%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	34.85%	—
Total return CAGR (5Y)	6.43%●	-5.02%

Frequently asked

Which is better, EPAC or SMR?: It depends on your goal. growth: SMR (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: EPAC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, EPAC leads 7 to 2.
Which has grown faster, EPAC or SMR?: Over the past five years, SMR grew revenue faster — EPAC at a 5.10% CAGR versus SMR at 120.81%.
Does EPAC or SMR pay a bigger dividend?: EPAC pays a dividend (0.12% yield) while SMR does not currently pay one.
Is EPAC or SMR more profitable?: EPAC runs the higher net margin — EPAC at 14.72% versus SMR at -2066.55%.
Which has been the better investment, EPAC or SMR?: Over the past 5-year, EPAC delivered the higher annualized total return — EPAC at 3.86% versus SMR at -5.02%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full EPAC analysis Full SMR analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Enerpac Tool P/E ratio NuScale Power P/E ratio Enerpac Tool dividend yield NuScale Power dividend yield Enerpac Tool ROE NuScale Power ROE Enerpac Tool operating margin NuScale Power operating margin Enerpac Tool revenue growth NuScale Power revenue growth Enerpac Tool free cash flow NuScale Power free cash flow

Enerpac Tool & NuScale Power appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 18, 2026.