Is EPAC or OSS cheaper?

On trailing earnings, EPAC is cheaper: EPAC trades at a 21.91 P/E and OSS at 55.82.

Which has grown faster, EPAC or OSS?

Over the past five years, EPAC grew revenue faster — EPAC at a 6.64% CAGR versus OSS at -11.58%.

Does EPAC or OSS pay a bigger dividend?

EPAC pays a dividend (0.11% yield) while OSS does not currently pay one.

Is EPAC or OSS more profitable?

OSS runs the higher net margin — EPAC at 13.69% versus OSS at 23.50%.

Which has been the better investment, EPAC or OSS?

Over the past 5-year, OSS delivered the higher annualized total return — EPAC at 3.09% versus OSS at 22.76%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC) vs One Stop Systems, Inc. (OSS)

EPAC leads on 9 of 13 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Enerpac Tool Group Corp. and One Stop Systems, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

EPAC

Enerpac Tool Group Corp.

$1.85B

$35.05Industrials

OSS

One Stop Systems, Inc.

$412M

$16.65Technology

Total return — EPAC vs OSS

growth of $100 · last 8y

EPAC +42.8%OSS +241.2%OSS compounded faster

EPAC OSS

EPAC vs OSS: by the numbers

•EPAC is the larger company ($1.85B vs $412M market cap).
•EPAC trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.91 vs 55.82 P/E).
•OSS converts more revenue to profit (23.50% vs 13.69% net margin).
•EPAC grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.64% vs -11.58% CAGR).
•EPAC pays a dividend (0.11% yield) while OSS does not currently pay one.

Which is better, EPAC or OSS?

Metric tally: EPAC 9 · OSS 4

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueEPAC(lower P/E)

GrowthEPAC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityEPAC(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	EPAC	OSS
P/E ratio	21.91●	55.82
Forward P/E	18.50	—
P/S ratio	2.96●	14.66
P/B ratio	4.54●	9.06
PEG ratio	2.78	1.09●
EV / EBITDA	13.91	—
FCF yield	5.98%	—

Profitability

Metric	EPAC	OSS
Gross margin	48.58%	53.44%●
Operating margin	20.52%●	-7.51%
Net margin	13.69%	23.50%●
ROE	21.00%●	14.53%
ROIC	15.12%●	-7.12%

Dividends

Metric	EPAC	OSS
Dividend yield	0.11%	—
Payout ratio	2.33%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	EPAC	OSS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.64%●	-11.58%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	169.53%●	51.02%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	31.53%●	7.04%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	6.02%	22.76%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, EPAC or OSS?: It depends on your goal. value: EPAC (lower P/E); growth: EPAC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: EPAC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, EPAC leads 9 to 4.
Is EPAC or OSS cheaper?: On trailing earnings, EPAC is cheaper: EPAC trades at a 21.91 P/E and OSS at 55.82.
Which has grown faster, EPAC or OSS?: Over the past five years, EPAC grew revenue faster — EPAC at a 6.64% CAGR versus OSS at -11.58%.
Does EPAC or OSS pay a bigger dividend?: EPAC pays a dividend (0.11% yield) while OSS does not currently pay one.
Is EPAC or OSS more profitable?: OSS runs the higher net margin — EPAC at 13.69% versus OSS at 23.50%.
Which has been the better investment, EPAC or OSS?: Over the past 5-year, OSS delivered the higher annualized total return — EPAC at 3.09% versus OSS at 22.76%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full EPAC analysis Full OSS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Enerpac Tool P/E ratio One Stop Systems P/E ratio Enerpac Tool dividend yield One Stop Systems dividend yield Enerpac Tool ROE One Stop Systems ROE Enerpac Tool operating margin One Stop Systems operating margin Enerpac Tool revenue growth One Stop Systems revenue growth Enerpac Tool free cash flow One Stop Systems free cash flow

Enerpac Tool & One Stop Systems appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.