Which has grown faster, EPAC or ME?

Over the past five years, EPAC grew revenue faster — EPAC at a 6.64% CAGR versus ME at -9.07%.

Does EPAC or ME pay a bigger dividend?

EPAC pays a dividend (0.11% yield) while ME does not currently pay one.

Is EPAC or ME more profitable?

EPAC runs the higher net margin — EPAC at 13.69% versus ME at -134.54%.

Which has been the better investment, EPAC or ME?

Over the past 5-year, EPAC delivered the higher annualized total return — EPAC at 3.09% versus ME at -68.93%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC) vs 23andMe Holding Co. (ME)

EPAC leads on 6 of 9 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Enerpac Tool Group Corp. and 23andMe Holding Co. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

EPAC

Enerpac Tool Group Corp.

Total return — EPAC vs ME

growth of $100 · last 5y

EPAC +69.9%ME -99.7%EPAC compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

EPAC ME

EPAC vs ME: by the numbers

•EPAC is the larger company ($1.85B vs $15M market cap).
•EPAC is profitable (13.69% net margin) while ME runs a net loss (-134.54%).
•EPAC grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.64% vs -9.07% CAGR).
•EPAC pays a dividend (0.11% yield) while ME does not currently pay one.

Which is better, EPAC or ME?

Metric tally: EPAC 6 · ME 3

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthEPAC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityEPAC(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	EPAC	ME
P/E ratio	21.91	—
Forward P/E	18.50	—
P/S ratio	2.96	0.10●
P/B ratio	4.54	0.51●
PEG ratio	2.78	—
EV / EBITDA	13.91	—
FCF yield	5.98%	—

Profitability

Metric	EPAC	ME
Gross margin	48.58%	53.33%●
Operating margin	20.52%●	-114.00%
Net margin	13.69%●	-134.54%
ROE	21.00%●	-721.75%
ROIC	15.12%●	-553.10%

Dividends

Metric	EPAC	ME
Dividend yield	0.11%	—
Payout ratio	2.33%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	EPAC	ME
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.64%●	-9.07%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	169.53%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	31.53%	—
Total return CAGR (5Y)	6.02%●	-68.93%

Frequently asked

Which is better, EPAC or ME?: It depends on your goal. growth: EPAC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: EPAC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, EPAC leads 6 to 3.
Which has grown faster, EPAC or ME?: Over the past five years, EPAC grew revenue faster — EPAC at a 6.64% CAGR versus ME at -9.07%.
Does EPAC or ME pay a bigger dividend?: EPAC pays a dividend (0.11% yield) while ME does not currently pay one.
Is EPAC or ME more profitable?: EPAC runs the higher net margin — EPAC at 13.69% versus ME at -134.54%.
Which has been the better investment, EPAC or ME?: Over the past 5-year, EPAC delivered the higher annualized total return — EPAC at 3.09% versus ME at -68.93%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full EPAC analysis Full ME analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Enerpac Tool P/E ratio 23andMe P/E ratio Enerpac Tool dividend yield 23andMe dividend yield Enerpac Tool ROE 23andMe ROE Enerpac Tool operating margin 23andMe operating margin Enerpac Tool revenue growth 23andMe revenue growth Enerpac Tool free cash flow 23andMe free cash flow

Enerpac Tool & 23andMe appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.