Is EPAC or MATX cheaper?

On trailing earnings, MATX is cheaper: EPAC trades at a 21.91 P/E and MATX at 14.84.

Which has grown faster, EPAC or MATX?

Over the past five years, EPAC grew revenue faster — EPAC at a 6.64% CAGR versus MATX at 5.17%.

Does EPAC or MATX pay a bigger dividend?

EPAC yields 0.11% and MATX yields 0.71% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is EPAC or MATX more profitable?

EPAC runs the higher net margin — EPAC at 13.69% versus MATX at 12.92%.

Which has been the better investment, EPAC or MATX?

Over the past 10-year, MATX delivered the higher annualized total return — EPAC at 3.09% versus MATX at 21.90%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC) vs Matson, Inc. (MATX)

MATX leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Enerpac Tool Group Corp. and Matson, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

EPAC

Enerpac Tool Group Corp.

Total return — EPAC vs MATX

growth of $100 · last 30y

EPAC +2496.3%MATX +1261.7%EPAC compounded faster

EPAC MATX

EPAC vs MATX: by the numbers

•MATX is the larger company ($6.11B vs $1.85B market cap).
•MATX trades at the lower earnings multiple (14.84 vs 21.91 P/E).
•EPAC converts more revenue to profit (13.69% vs 12.92% net margin).
•EPAC grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.64% vs 5.17% CAGR).
•MATX pays the higher dividend yield (0.71% vs 0.11%).

Which is better, EPAC or MATX?

Metric tally: EPAC 8 · MATX 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueMATX(lower P/E)

GrowthEPAC(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeMATX(higher dividend yield)

QualityEPAC(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	EPAC	MATX
P/E ratio	21.91	14.84●
Forward P/E	18.50	14.44●
P/S ratio	2.96	1.86●
P/B ratio	4.54	2.26●
PEG ratio	2.78	0.58●
EV / EBITDA	13.91	8.66●
FCF yield	5.98%	6.77%●

Profitability

Metric	EPAC	MATX
Gross margin	48.58%●	22.42%
Operating margin	20.52%●	13.50%
Net margin	13.69%●	12.92%
ROE	21.00%●	15.72%
ROIC	15.12%●	8.85%

Dividends

Metric	EPAC	MATX
Dividend yield	0.11%	0.71%●
Payout ratio	2.33%	10.26%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	EPAC	MATX
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.64%●	5.17%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	169.53%●	25.67%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	31.53%●	7.72%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	6.02%	27.18%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, EPAC or MATX?: It depends on your goal. value: MATX (lower P/E); growth: EPAC (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MATX (higher dividend yield); quality: EPAC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MATX leads 9 to 8.
Is EPAC or MATX cheaper?: On trailing earnings, MATX is cheaper: EPAC trades at a 21.91 P/E and MATX at 14.84.
Which has grown faster, EPAC or MATX?: Over the past five years, EPAC grew revenue faster — EPAC at a 6.64% CAGR versus MATX at 5.17%.
Does EPAC or MATX pay a bigger dividend?: EPAC yields 0.11% and MATX yields 0.71% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is EPAC or MATX more profitable?: EPAC runs the higher net margin — EPAC at 13.69% versus MATX at 12.92%.
Which has been the better investment, EPAC or MATX?: Over the past 10-year, MATX delivered the higher annualized total return — EPAC at 3.09% versus MATX at 21.90%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full EPAC analysis Full MATX analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Enerpac Tool P/E ratio Matson P/E ratio Enerpac Tool dividend yield Matson dividend yield Enerpac Tool ROE Matson ROE Enerpac Tool operating margin Matson operating margin Enerpac Tool revenue growth Matson revenue growth Enerpac Tool free cash flow Matson free cash flow

Enerpac Tool & Matson appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.