Is EPAC or LQDT cheaper?

On trailing earnings, EPAC is cheaper: EPAC trades at a 21.91 P/E and LQDT at 40.80.

Which has grown faster, EPAC or LQDT?

Over the past five years, LQDT grew revenue faster — EPAC at a 6.64% CAGR versus LQDT at 16.76%.

Does EPAC or LQDT pay a bigger dividend?

EPAC pays a dividend (0.11% yield) while LQDT does not currently pay one.

Is EPAC or LQDT more profitable?

EPAC runs the higher net margin — EPAC at 13.69% versus LQDT at 6.30%.

Which has been the better investment, EPAC or LQDT?

Over the past 10-year, LQDT delivered the higher annualized total return — EPAC at 3.09% versus LQDT at 18.06%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC) vs Liquidity Services, Inc. (LQDT)

EPAC leads on 11 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Enerpac Tool Group Corp. and Liquidity Services, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

EPAC

Enerpac Tool Group Corp.

$1.85B

$35.05Industrials

LQDT

Liquidity Services, Inc.

$1.18B

$37.94Consumer Cyclical

Total return — EPAC vs LQDT

growth of $100 · last 20y

EPAC +28.7%LQDT +208.7%LQDT compounded faster

EPAC LQDT

EPAC vs LQDT: by the numbers

•EPAC is the larger company ($1.85B vs $1.18B market cap).
•EPAC trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.91 vs 40.80 P/E).
•EPAC converts more revenue to profit (13.69% vs 6.30% net margin).
•LQDT grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.76% vs 6.64% CAGR).
•EPAC pays a dividend (0.11% yield) while LQDT does not currently pay one.

Which is better, EPAC or LQDT?

Metric tally: EPAC 11 · LQDT 5

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueEPAC(lower P/E)

GrowthLQDT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityEPAC(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	EPAC	LQDT
P/E ratio	21.91●	40.80
Forward P/E	18.50●	25.21
P/S ratio	2.96	2.55●
P/B ratio	4.54●	5.52
PEG ratio	2.78	0.80●
EV / EBITDA	13.91●	18.90
FCF yield	5.98%	6.35%●

Profitability

Metric	EPAC	LQDT
Gross margin	48.58%●	45.61%
Operating margin	20.52%●	8.37%
Net margin	13.69%●	6.30%
ROE	21.00%●	13.62%
ROIC	15.12%●	11.42%

Dividends

Metric	EPAC	LQDT
Dividend yield	0.11%	—
Payout ratio	2.33%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	EPAC	LQDT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.64%	16.76%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	169.53%●	-0.58%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	31.53%●	6.73%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	6.02%	10.63%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, EPAC or LQDT?: It depends on your goal. value: EPAC (lower P/E); growth: LQDT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: EPAC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, EPAC leads 11 to 5.
Is EPAC or LQDT cheaper?: On trailing earnings, EPAC is cheaper: EPAC trades at a 21.91 P/E and LQDT at 40.80.
Which has grown faster, EPAC or LQDT?: Over the past five years, LQDT grew revenue faster — EPAC at a 6.64% CAGR versus LQDT at 16.76%.
Does EPAC or LQDT pay a bigger dividend?: EPAC pays a dividend (0.11% yield) while LQDT does not currently pay one.
Is EPAC or LQDT more profitable?: EPAC runs the higher net margin — EPAC at 13.69% versus LQDT at 6.30%.
Which has been the better investment, EPAC or LQDT?: Over the past 10-year, LQDT delivered the higher annualized total return — EPAC at 3.09% versus LQDT at 18.06%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full EPAC analysis Full LQDT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Enerpac Tool P/E ratio Liquidity Services P/E ratio Enerpac Tool dividend yield Liquidity Services dividend yield Enerpac Tool ROE Liquidity Services ROE Enerpac Tool operating margin Liquidity Services operating margin Enerpac Tool revenue growth Liquidity Services revenue growth Enerpac Tool free cash flow Liquidity Services free cash flow

Enerpac Tool & Liquidity Services appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.