Is EPAC or GTM cheaper?

On trailing earnings, GTM is cheaper: EPAC trades at a 21.91 P/E and GTM at 7.16.

Which has grown faster, EPAC or GTM?

Over the past five years, GTM grew revenue faster — EPAC at a 6.64% CAGR versus GTM at 18.92%.

Does EPAC or GTM pay a bigger dividend?

EPAC pays a dividend (0.11% yield) while GTM does not currently pay one.

Is EPAC or GTM more profitable?

EPAC runs the higher net margin — EPAC at 13.69% versus GTM at 10.10%.

Which has been the better investment, EPAC or GTM?

Over the past 5-year, EPAC delivered the higher annualized total return — EPAC at 3.09% versus GTM at -42.92%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC) vs ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. (GTM)

GTM leads on 9 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Enerpac Tool Group Corp. and ZoomInfo Technologies Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 15, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

EPAC

Enerpac Tool Group Corp.

$1.85B

$35.05Industrials

GTM

ZoomInfo Technologies Inc.

$828M

$2.81Technology

Total return — EPAC vs GTM

growth of $100 · last 6y

EPAC +85.2%GTM -91.7%EPAC compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

EPAC GTM

EPAC vs GTM: by the numbers

•EPAC is the larger company ($1.85B vs $828M market cap).
•GTM trades at the lower earnings multiple (7.16 vs 21.91 P/E).
•EPAC converts more revenue to profit (13.69% vs 10.10% net margin).
•GTM grew revenue faster over the past five years (18.92% vs 6.64% CAGR).
•EPAC pays a dividend (0.11% yield) while GTM does not currently pay one.

Which is better, EPAC or GTM?

Metric tally: EPAC 6 · GTM 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueGTM(lower P/E)

GrowthGTM(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityEPAC(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	EPAC	GTM
P/E ratio	21.91	7.16●
Forward P/E	18.50	2.54●
P/S ratio	2.96	0.71●
P/B ratio	4.54	0.60●
PEG ratio	2.78	0.07●
EV / EBITDA	13.91	7.07●
FCF yield	5.98%	42.02%●

Profitability

Metric	EPAC	GTM
Gross margin	48.58%	84.21%●
Operating margin	20.52%●	19.40%
Net margin	13.69%●	10.10%
ROE	21.00%●	8.60%
ROIC	15.12%●	2.48%

Dividends

Metric	EPAC	GTM
Dividend yield	0.11%	—
Payout ratio	2.33%	—

Growth (annualized)

Metric	EPAC	GTM
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.64%	18.92%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	169.53%	—
FCF CAGR (5Y)	31.53%●	11.57%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	6.02%●	-42.92%

Frequently asked

Which is better, EPAC or GTM?: It depends on your goal. value: GTM (lower P/E); growth: GTM (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: EPAC (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, GTM leads 9 to 6.
Is EPAC or GTM cheaper?: On trailing earnings, GTM is cheaper: EPAC trades at a 21.91 P/E and GTM at 7.16.
Which has grown faster, EPAC or GTM?: Over the past five years, GTM grew revenue faster — EPAC at a 6.64% CAGR versus GTM at 18.92%.
Does EPAC or GTM pay a bigger dividend?: EPAC pays a dividend (0.11% yield) while GTM does not currently pay one.
Is EPAC or GTM more profitable?: EPAC runs the higher net margin — EPAC at 13.69% versus GTM at 10.10%.
Which has been the better investment, EPAC or GTM?: Over the past 5-year, EPAC delivered the higher annualized total return — EPAC at 3.09% versus GTM at -42.92%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full EPAC analysis Full GTM analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Enerpac Tool P/E ratio ZoomInfo Technologies P/E ratio Enerpac Tool dividend yield ZoomInfo Technologies dividend yield Enerpac Tool ROE ZoomInfo Technologies ROE Enerpac Tool operating margin ZoomInfo Technologies operating margin Enerpac Tool revenue growth ZoomInfo Technologies revenue growth Enerpac Tool free cash flow ZoomInfo Technologies free cash flow

Enerpac Tool & ZoomInfo Technologies appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 15, 2026.