EnerSys (ENS) vs Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO)
SIMO leads on 11 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of EnerSys and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 25, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
ENS
EnerSys
$190.75IndustrialsAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
SIMO
Silicon Motion Technology Corporation
$270.90TechnologyAt close: Jul 24, 2026, 4:00 PM ET
Total return — ENS vs SIMO
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 21yENS +1511.7%SIMO +3536.4%SIMO compounded faster
ENS SIMO
ENS vs SIMO: by the numbers
- •SIMO is the larger company ($9.09B vs $6.95B market cap).
- •SIMO trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.10 vs 24.74 P/E).
- •SIMO converts more revenue to profit (16.02% vs 7.82% net margin).
- •SIMO grew revenue faster over the past five years (12.49% vs 4.73% CAGR).
- •SIMO pays the higher dividend yield (0.74% vs 0.55%).
Which is better, ENS or SIMO?
Metric tally: ENS 6 · SIMO 11It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueSIMO(lower P/E)
GrowthSIMO(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeSIMO(higher dividend yield)
QualityENS(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ENS | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 24.74 | 21.10● |
| Forward P/E | 18.44● | 30.51 |
| P/S ratio | 1.94● | 2.57 |
| P/B ratio | 3.82 | 2.74● |
| PEG ratio | 1.34 | 0.17● |
| EV / EBITDA | 14.36● | 16.83 |
| FCF yield | 6.43%● | 0.28% |
Profitability
| Metric | ENS | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 29.26% | 48.09%● |
| Operating margin | 11.87% | 12.77%● |
| Net margin | 7.82% | 16.02%● |
| ROE | 15.40% | 18.76%● |
| ROIC | 12.37%● | 9.22% |
Dividends
| Metric | ENS | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.55% | 0.74%● |
| Payout ratio | 13.39% | 13.70% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ENS | SIMO |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 4.73% | 12.49%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 18.40% | 44.85%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 10.15%● | -42.15% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 15.56% | 37.15%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ENS or SIMO?
- It depends on your goal. value: SIMO (lower P/E); growth: SIMO (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: SIMO (higher dividend yield); quality: ENS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SIMO leads 11 to 6.
- Is ENS or SIMO cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, SIMO is cheaper: ENS trades at a 24.74 P/E and SIMO at 21.10.
- Which has grown faster, ENS or SIMO?
- Over the past five years, SIMO grew revenue faster — ENS at a 4.73% CAGR versus SIMO at 12.49%.
- Does ENS or SIMO pay a bigger dividend?
- ENS yields 0.55% and SIMO yields 0.74% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ENS or SIMO more profitable?
- SIMO runs the higher net margin — ENS at 7.82% versus SIMO at 16.02%.
- Which has been the better investment, ENS or SIMO?
- Over the past 10-year, SIMO delivered the higher annualized total return — ENS at 12.39% versus SIMO at 20.85%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
EnerSys P/E ratioSilicon Motion Technology P/E ratioEnerSys dividend yieldSilicon Motion Technology dividend yieldEnerSys ROESilicon Motion Technology ROEEnerSys operating marginSilicon Motion Technology operating marginEnerSys revenue growthSilicon Motion Technology revenue growthEnerSys free cash flowSilicon Motion Technology free cash flow
EnerSys & Silicon Motion Technology appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 25, 2026.