Which has the lower trailing P/E, ENS or MATX?

MATX has the lower trailing P/E: ENS trades at 20.32 and MATX at 14.89. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, ENS or MATX?

Over the past five years, ENS grew revenue faster — ENS at a 4.20% CAGR versus MATX at 3.36%.

Does ENS or MATX pay a bigger dividend?

ENS yields 0.55% and MATX yields 0.66% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is ENS or MATX more profitable?

MATX runs the higher net margin — ENS at 9.29% versus MATX at 13.41%.

How have ENS and MATX total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, ENS delivered 11.45% and MATX delivered 21.96% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

EnerSys (ENS) vs Matson, Inc. (MATX)

A side-by-side comparison of EnerSys and Matson, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of August 23, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

ENS

EnerSys

$6.92B

$189.76IndustrialsAt close: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

MATX

Matson, Inc.

$6.74B

$222.80IndustrialsAt close: Aug 21, 2026, 4:00 PM ET

Total return — ENS vs MATX

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

ENS +198.9% (+11.6%/yr)MATX +618.4% (+21.8%/yr)MATX compounded faster over this window

ENS MATX

ENS vs MATX: by the numbers

•ENS is the larger company ($6.92B vs $6.74B market cap).
•MATX trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (14.89 vs 20.32 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•MATX converts more revenue to profit (13.41% vs 9.29% net margin).
•ENS grew revenue faster over the past five years (4.20% vs 3.36% CAGR).
•MATX pays the higher dividend yield (0.66% vs 0.55%).

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ENS	MATX
P/E ratio	20.32	14.89
Forward P/E	18.35	13.88
P/S ratio	1.88	1.95
P/B ratio	3.62	2.43
EV / EBITDA	12.19	9.52
FCF yield	10.05%	1.83%

Profitability

Metric	ENS	MATX
Gross margin	30.51%	23.02%
Operating margin	13.45%	14.49%
Net margin	9.29%	13.41%
ROE	17.89%	16.72%
ROIC	13.39%	10.16%

Dividends

Metric	ENS	MATX
Dividend yield	0.55%	0.66%
Payout ratio	13.39%	10.40%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ENS	MATX
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	4.20%	3.36%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	18.40%	25.67%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	39.95%	-15.37%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	18.29%	26.57%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ENS or MATX?: MATX has the lower trailing P/E: ENS trades at 20.32 and MATX at 14.89. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ENS or MATX?: Over the past five years, ENS grew revenue faster — ENS at a 4.20% CAGR versus MATX at 3.36%.
Does ENS or MATX pay a bigger dividend?: ENS yields 0.55% and MATX yields 0.66% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is ENS or MATX more profitable?: MATX runs the higher net margin — ENS at 9.29% versus MATX at 13.41%.
How have ENS and MATX total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, ENS delivered 11.45% and MATX delivered 21.96% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ENS analysis Full MATX analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

EnerSys P/E ratio Matson P/E ratio EnerSys dividend yield Matson dividend yield EnerSys ROE Matson ROE EnerSys operating margin Matson operating margin EnerSys revenue growth Matson revenue growth EnerSys free cash flow Matson free cash flow

EnerSys & Matson appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks Lowest P/E Ratio Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified August 23, 2026.