Is ENS or MATX cheaper?

On trailing earnings, MATX is cheaper: ENS trades at a 25.90 P/E and MATX at 15.04.

Which has grown faster, ENS or MATX?

Over the past five years, MATX grew revenue faster — ENS at a 4.73% CAGR versus MATX at 5.17%.

Does ENS or MATX pay a bigger dividend?

ENS yields 0.53% and MATX yields 0.74% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is ENS or MATX more profitable?

MATX runs the higher net margin — ENS at 7.82% versus MATX at 12.92%.

Which has been the better investment, ENS or MATX?

Over the past 10-year, MATX delivered the higher annualized total return — ENS at 13.55% versus MATX at 21.91%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

EnerSys (ENS) vs Matson, Inc. (MATX)

MATX leads on 14 of 17 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of EnerSys and Matson, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 9, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — ENS vs MATX

growth of $100 · last 22y

ENS +1497.4%MATX +1080.7%ENS compounded faster

ENS MATX

ENS vs MATX: by the numbers

•ENS is the larger company ($7.52B vs $6.24B market cap).
•MATX trades at the lower earnings multiple (15.04 vs 25.90 P/E).
•MATX converts more revenue to profit (12.92% vs 7.82% net margin).
•MATX grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.17% vs 4.73% CAGR).
•MATX pays the higher dividend yield (0.74% vs 0.53%).

Which is better, ENS or MATX?

Metric tally: ENS 3 · MATX 14

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueMATX(lower P/E)

GrowthMATX(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeMATX(higher dividend yield)

QualityENS(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ENS	MATX
P/E ratio	25.90	15.04●
Forward P/E	19.30	14.14●
P/S ratio	2.03	1.89●
P/B ratio	4.00	2.29●
PEG ratio	1.41	0.59●
EV / EBITDA	14.97	9.60●
FCF yield	6.14%	6.68%●

Profitability

Metric	ENS	MATX
Gross margin	29.26%●	22.42%
Operating margin	11.87%	13.50%●
Net margin	7.82%	12.92%●
ROE	15.40%	15.72%●
ROIC	12.37%●	8.85%

Dividends

Metric	ENS	MATX
Dividend yield	0.53%	0.74%●
Payout ratio	13.39%	10.83%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ENS	MATX
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	4.73%	5.17%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	18.40%	25.67%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	10.15%●	7.72%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	17.13%	28.50%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, ENS or MATX?: It depends on your goal. value: MATX (lower P/E); growth: MATX (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: MATX (higher dividend yield); quality: ENS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, MATX leads 14 to 3.
Is ENS or MATX cheaper?: On trailing earnings, MATX is cheaper: ENS trades at a 25.90 P/E and MATX at 15.04.
Which has grown faster, ENS or MATX?: Over the past five years, MATX grew revenue faster — ENS at a 4.73% CAGR versus MATX at 5.17%.
Does ENS or MATX pay a bigger dividend?: ENS yields 0.53% and MATX yields 0.74% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is ENS or MATX more profitable?: MATX runs the higher net margin — ENS at 7.82% versus MATX at 12.92%.
Which has been the better investment, ENS or MATX?: Over the past 10-year, MATX delivered the higher annualized total return — ENS at 13.55% versus MATX at 21.91%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ENS analysis Full MATX analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

EnerSys P/E ratio Matson P/E ratio EnerSys dividend yield Matson dividend yield EnerSys ROE Matson ROE EnerSys operating margin Matson operating margin EnerSys revenue growth Matson revenue growth EnerSys free cash flow Matson free cash flow

EnerSys & Matson appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 9, 2026.