Which has the lower trailing P/E, ENS or KTOS?

ENS has the lower trailing P/E: ENS trades at 21.02 and KTOS at 252.76. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.

Which has grown faster, ENS or KTOS?

Over the past five years, KTOS grew revenue faster — ENS at a 4.20% CAGR versus KTOS at 13.51%.

Does ENS or KTOS pay a bigger dividend?

ENS pays a dividend (0.55% yield), while KTOS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Is ENS or KTOS more profitable?

ENS runs the higher net margin — ENS at 9.29% versus KTOS at 2.03%.

How have ENS and KTOS total returns compared?

Over the past 10 years, ENS delivered 12.02% and KTOS delivered 20.11% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

EnerSys (ENS) vs Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. (KTOS)

A side-by-side comparison of EnerSys and Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of October 3, 2026. Differences are shown without an overall score or investment verdict.

ENS

EnerSys

$7.16B

$196.30IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

KTOS

Kratos Defense & Security Solutions, Inc.

$8.08B

$43.07IndustrialsDelayed quote: Oct 2, 2026, 4:00 PM EDT

Total return — ENS vs KTOS

growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 10y

ENS +213.4% (+12.1%/yr)KTOS +547.7% (+20.5%/yr)KTOS compounded faster over this window

ENS KTOS

ENS vs KTOS: by the numbers

•KTOS is the larger company ($8.08B vs $7.16B market cap).
•ENS trades at the lower trailing earnings multiple (21.02 vs 252.76 P/E), one valuation lens rather than an overall verdict.
•ENS converts more revenue to profit (9.29% vs 2.03% net margin).
•KTOS grew revenue faster over the past five years (13.51% vs 4.20% CAGR).
•ENS pays a dividend (0.55% yield), while KTOS has no payments in the available dividend history.

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	ENS	KTOS
P/E ratio	21.02	252.76
Forward P/E	14.68	N/A
PEG ratio	1.15	N/A
P/S ratio	1.89	5.30
P/B ratio	3.63	2.36
EV / EBITDA	12.21	59.99
FCF yield	10.02%	N/A

Profitability

Metric	ENS	KTOS
Gross margin	30.51%	21.99%
Operating margin	13.45%	1.54%
Net margin	9.29%	2.03%
ROE	17.89%	0.90%
ROIC	13.39%	0.49%

Dividends

Metric	ENS	KTOS
Dividend yield	0.55%	N/A
Payout ratio	11.51%	N/A

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ENS	KTOS
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	4.20%	13.51%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	18.40%	-28.43%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	39.95%	N/A
Total return CAGR (5Y)	21.83%	13.79%

Frequently asked

Which has the lower trailing P/E, ENS or KTOS?: ENS has the lower trailing P/E: ENS trades at 21.02 and KTOS at 252.76. P/E is one valuation measure and does not by itself establish which business is cheaper.
Which has grown faster, ENS or KTOS?: Over the past five years, KTOS grew revenue faster — ENS at a 4.20% CAGR versus KTOS at 13.51%.
Does ENS or KTOS pay a bigger dividend?: ENS pays a dividend (0.55% yield), while KTOS has no payments in the available dividend history.
Is ENS or KTOS more profitable?: ENS runs the higher net margin — ENS at 9.29% versus KTOS at 2.03%.
How have ENS and KTOS total returns compared?: Over the past 10 years, ENS delivered 12.02% and KTOS delivered 20.11% annualized total return. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ENS analysis Full KTOS analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

EnerSys P/E ratio Kratos Defense & Security Solutions P/E ratio EnerSys dividend yield EnerSys ROE Kratos Defense & Security Solutions ROE EnerSys operating margin Kratos Defense & Security Solutions operating margin EnerSys revenue growth Kratos Defense & Security Solutions revenue growth EnerSys free cash flow Kratos Defense & Security Solutions free cash flow

EnerSys & Kratos Defense & Security Solutions appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Highest 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified October 3, 2026.