Emerson Electric Co. (EMR) vs Parker-Hannifin Corporation (PH)
PH leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Emerson Electric Co. and Parker-Hannifin Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
EMR
Emerson Electric Co.
$143.07Industrials
PH
Parker-Hannifin Corporation
$903.48Industrials
Total return — EMR vs PH
growth of $100 · last 30yEMR +556.0%PH +4872.4%PH compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
EMR PH
EMR vs PH: by the numbers
- •PH is the larger company ($113.92B vs $80.13B market cap).
- •EMR trades at the lower earnings multiple (33.04 vs 33.34 P/E).
- •PH converts more revenue to profit (16.58% vs 13.35% net margin).
- •PH grew revenue faster over the past five years (9.15% vs 1.43% CAGR).
- •EMR pays the higher dividend yield (1.53% vs 0.82%).
Which is better, EMR or PH?
Metric tally: EMR 7 · PH 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
GrowthPH(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeEMR(higher dividend yield)
QualityPH(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | EMR | PH |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 33.04 | 33.34 |
| Forward P/E | 19.92● | 26.53 |
| P/S ratio | 4.40● | 5.51 |
| P/B ratio | 3.97● | 7.92 |
| PEG ratio | 1.77 | 1.04● |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.92● | 22.16 |
| FCF yield | 3.87%● | 3.18% |
Profitability
| Metric | EMR | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 52.66%● | 37.23% |
| Operating margin | 19.96% | 20.87%● |
| Net margin | 13.35% | 16.58%● |
| ROE | 12.04% | 23.82%● |
| ROIC | 7.26% | 13.69%● |
Dividends
| Metric | EMR | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.53%● | 0.82% |
| Payout ratio | 53.87% | 26.89% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | EMR | PH |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 1.43% | 9.15%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 4.54% | 24.00%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | -0.23% | 8.25%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 10.27% | 26.11%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, EMR or PH?
- It depends on your goal. growth: PH (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: EMR (higher dividend yield); quality: PH (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, PH leads 9 to 7.
- Is EMR or PH cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, EMR is cheaper: EMR trades at a 33.04 P/E and PH at 33.34.
- Which has grown faster, EMR or PH?
- Over the past five years, PH grew revenue faster — EMR at a 1.43% CAGR versus PH at 9.15%.
- Does EMR or PH pay a bigger dividend?
- EMR yields 1.53% and PH yields 0.82% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is EMR or PH more profitable?
- PH runs the higher net margin — EMR at 13.35% versus PH at 16.58%.
- Which has been the better investment, EMR or PH?
- Over the past 10-year, PH delivered the higher annualized total return — EMR at 13.28% versus PH at 25.01%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Emerson Electric P/E ratioParker-Hannifin P/E ratioEmerson Electric dividend yieldParker-Hannifin dividend yieldEmerson Electric ROEParker-Hannifin ROEEmerson Electric operating marginParker-Hannifin operating marginEmerson Electric revenue growthParker-Hannifin revenue growthEmerson Electric free cash flowParker-Hannifin free cash flow
Emerson Electric & Parker-Hannifin appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.