EMCOR Group, Inc. (EME) vs Thomson Reuters Corporation (TRI)
TRI leads on 9 of 17 compared metrics, though EME is the cheaper stock.
A side-by-side comparison of EMCOR Group, Inc. and Thomson Reuters Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
EME
EMCOR Group, Inc.
$755.10IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 15, 2026, 10:45 AM EDT
TRI
Thomson Reuters Corporation
$98.30IndustrialsDelayed quote: Jul 15, 2026, 10:45 AM EDT
Total return — EME vs TRI
growth of $100 · dividends reinvested · last 24yEME +5966.1%TRI +370.1%EME compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
EME TRI
EME vs TRI: by the numbers
- •TRI is the larger company ($42.91B vs $33.63B market cap).
- •EME trades at the lower earnings multiple (26.02 vs 26.82 P/E).
- •TRI converts more revenue to profit (19.93% vs 7.52% net margin).
- •EME grew revenue faster over the past five years (15.06% vs 4.86% CAGR).
- •TRI pays the higher dividend yield (4.30% vs 0.17%).
Which is better, EME or TRI?
Metric tally: EME 8 · TRI 9It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueEME(lower P/E)
GrowthEME(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeTRI(higher dividend yield)
QualityEME(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | EME | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 26.02● | 26.82 |
| Forward P/E | 26.39 | 21.18● |
| P/S ratio | 1.97● | 5.24 |
| P/B ratio | 9.03 | 3.39● |
| PEG ratio | 0.71● | 3.72 |
| EV / EBITDA | 17.78 | 14.11● |
| FCF yield | 3.09% | 5.21%● |
Profitability
| Metric | EME | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 19.54% | 75.81%● |
| Operating margin | 9.89% | 26.66%● |
| Net margin | 7.52% | 19.93%● |
| ROE | 34.52%● | 12.89% |
| ROIC | 24.16%● | 10.13% |
Dividends
| Metric | EME | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 0.17% | 4.30%● |
| Payout ratio | 4.61% | 116.05% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | EME | TRI |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 15.06%● | 4.86% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 63.55%● | 7.22% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 7.48% | 9.45%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 45.21%● | -1.13% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, EME or TRI?
- It depends on your goal. value: EME (lower P/E); growth: EME (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: TRI (higher dividend yield); quality: EME (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TRI leads 9 to 8.
- Is EME or TRI cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, EME is cheaper: EME trades at a 26.02 P/E and TRI at 26.82.
- Which has grown faster, EME or TRI?
- Over the past five years, EME grew revenue faster — EME at a 15.06% CAGR versus TRI at 4.86%.
- Does EME or TRI pay a bigger dividend?
- EME yields 0.17% and TRI yields 4.30% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is EME or TRI more profitable?
- TRI runs the higher net margin — EME at 7.52% versus TRI at 19.93%.
- Which has been the better investment, EME or TRI?
- Over the past 10-year, EME delivered the higher annualized total return — EME at 31.52% versus TRI at 8.55%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
EMCOR P/E ratioThomson Reuters P/E ratioEMCOR dividend yieldThomson Reuters dividend yieldEMCOR ROEThomson Reuters ROEEMCOR operating marginThomson Reuters operating marginEMCOR revenue growthThomson Reuters revenue growthEMCOR free cash flowThomson Reuters free cash flow
EMCOR & Thomson Reuters appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 14, 2026.