Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) vs NRG Energy, Inc. (NRG)
ED leads on 10 of 15 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Consolidated Edison, Inc. and NRG Energy, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 9, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — ED vs NRG
growth of $100 · last 23yED +175.6%NRG +1327.6%NRG compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
ED NRG
ED vs NRG: by the numbers
- •ED is the larger company ($40.64B vs $29.64B market cap).
- •ED trades at the lower earnings multiple (18.87 vs 161.74 P/E).
- •ED converts more revenue to profit (12.52% vs 0.74% net margin).
- •NRG grew revenue faster over the past five years (16.42% vs 6.30% CAGR).
- •ED pays the higher dividend yield (3.17% vs 1.38%).
Which is better, ED or NRG?
Metric tally: ED 10 · NRG 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueED(lower P/E)
GrowthNRG(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeED(higher dividend yield)
QualityNRG(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | ED | NRG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 18.87● | 161.74 |
| Forward P/E | 18.37 | — |
| P/S ratio | 2.37 | 0.88● |
| P/B ratio | 1.60● | 5.87 |
| PEG ratio | 2.31● | 11.17 |
| EV / EBITDA | 13.45● | 17.01 |
| FCF yield | 6.89% | — |
Profitability
| Metric | ED | NRG |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 65.01%● | 17.07% |
| Operating margin | 17.33%● | 3.00% |
| Net margin | 12.52%● | 0.74% |
| ROE | 8.42%● | 4.90% |
| ROIC | 3.24% | 7.00%● |
Dividends
| Metric | ED | NRG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.17%● | 1.38% |
| Payout ratio | 62.72% | 46.45% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ED | NRG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.30% | 16.42%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 11.46% | 14.48%● |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 47.32%● | -13.77% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 12.73% | 30.80%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ED or NRG?
- It depends on your goal. value: ED (lower P/E); growth: NRG (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: ED (higher dividend yield); quality: NRG (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ED leads 10 to 5.
- Is ED or NRG cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, ED is cheaper: ED trades at a 18.87 P/E and NRG at 161.74.
- Which has grown faster, ED or NRG?
- Over the past five years, NRG grew revenue faster — ED at a 6.30% CAGR versus NRG at 16.42%.
- Does ED or NRG pay a bigger dividend?
- ED yields 3.17% and NRG yields 1.38% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ED or NRG more profitable?
- ED runs the higher net margin — ED at 12.52% versus NRG at 0.74%.
- Which has been the better investment, ED or NRG?
- Over the past 10-year, NRG delivered the higher annualized total return — ED at 7.16% versus NRG at 27.33%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Consolidated Edison P/E ratioNRG Energy P/E ratioConsolidated Edison dividend yieldNRG Energy dividend yieldConsolidated Edison ROENRG Energy ROEConsolidated Edison operating marginNRG Energy operating marginConsolidated Edison revenue growthNRG Energy revenue growthConsolidated Edison free cash flowNRG Energy free cash flow
Consolidated Edison & NRG Energy appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 9, 2026.