Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) vs Alliant Energy Corporation (LNT)
ED leads on 11 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Consolidated Edison, Inc. and Alliant Energy Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
ED
Consolidated Edison, Inc.
$107.74Utilities
LNT
Alliant Energy Corporation
$73.11Utilities
Total return — ED vs LNT
growth of $100 · last 30yED +286.4%LNT +389.4%LNT compounded faster
ED LNT
ED vs LNT: by the numbers
- •ED is the larger company ($39.71B vs $18.88B market cap).
- •ED trades at the lower earnings multiple (18.14 vs 22.92 P/E).
- •LNT converts more revenue to profit (18.58% vs 12.52% net margin).
- •ED grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.30% vs 5.38% CAGR).
- •ED pays the higher dividend yield (3.23% vs 2.85%).
Which is better, ED or LNT?
Metric tally: ED 11 · LNT 5It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueED(lower P/E)
GrowthED(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeED(higher dividend yield)
QualityLNT(higher ROIC)
Valuation
| Metric | ED | LNT |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 18.14● | 22.92 |
| Forward P/E | 16.62● | 19.85 |
| P/S ratio | 2.28● | 4.28 |
| P/B ratio | 1.53● | 2.55 |
| PEG ratio | 2.31 | 1.21● |
| EV / EBITDA | 9.50● | 14.94 |
| FCF yield | 7.17% | — |
Profitability
| Metric | ED | LNT |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 65.01%● | 37.97% |
| Operating margin | 17.33% | 23.01%● |
| Net margin | 12.52% | 18.58%● |
| ROE | 8.42% | 11.06%● |
| ROIC | 3.24% | 4.12%● |
Dividends
| Metric | ED | LNT |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.23%● | 2.85% |
| Payout ratio | 61.40% | 66.19% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | ED | LNT |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.30%● | 5.38% |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 11.46%● | 4.98% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 47.32%● | 15.57% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 10.69%● | 7.95% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, ED or LNT?
- It depends on your goal. value: ED (lower P/E); growth: ED (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: ED (higher dividend yield); quality: LNT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ED leads 11 to 5.
- Is ED or LNT cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, ED is cheaper: ED trades at a 18.14 P/E and LNT at 22.92.
- Which has grown faster, ED or LNT?
- Over the past five years, ED grew revenue faster — ED at a 6.30% CAGR versus LNT at 5.38%.
- Does ED or LNT pay a bigger dividend?
- ED yields 3.23% and LNT yields 2.85% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is ED or LNT more profitable?
- LNT runs the higher net margin — ED at 12.52% versus LNT at 18.58%.
- Which has been the better investment, ED or LNT?
- Over the past 10-year, LNT delivered the higher annualized total return — ED at 7.17% versus LNT at 9.86%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Consolidated Edison P/E ratioAlliant Energy P/E ratioConsolidated Edison dividend yieldAlliant Energy dividend yieldConsolidated Edison ROEAlliant Energy ROEConsolidated Edison operating marginAlliant Energy operating marginConsolidated Edison revenue growthAlliant Energy revenue growthConsolidated Edison free cash flowAlliant Energy free cash flow
Consolidated Edison & Alliant Energy appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.