On trailing earnings, ED is cheaper: ED trades at a 18.14 P/E and FE at 25.63.

Which has grown faster, ED or FE?

Over the past five years, FE grew revenue faster — ED at a 6.30% CAGR versus FE at 7.52%.

Does ED or FE pay a bigger dividend?

ED yields 3.23% and FE yields 3.83% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is ED or FE more profitable?

ED runs the higher net margin — ED at 12.52% versus FE at 6.86%.

Which has been the better investment, ED or FE?

Over the past 10-year, FE delivered the higher annualized total return — ED at 7.17% versus FE at 7.77%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Consolidated Edison, Inc. (ED) vs FirstEnergy Corp. (FE)

ED leads on 10 of 16 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Consolidated Edison, Inc. and FirstEnergy Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Consolidated Edison, Inc.

Total return — ED vs FE

growth of $100 · last 30y

ED +286.4%FE +124.0%ED compounded faster

ED FE

ED vs FE: by the numbers

•ED is the larger company ($39.71B vs $27.20B market cap).
•ED trades at the lower earnings multiple (18.14 vs 25.63 P/E).
•ED converts more revenue to profit (12.52% vs 6.86% net margin).
•FE grew revenue faster over the past five years (7.52% vs 6.30% CAGR).
•FE pays the higher dividend yield (3.83% vs 3.23%).

Which is better, ED or FE?

Metric tally: ED 10 · FE 6

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueED(lower P/E)

GrowthFE(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeFE(higher dividend yield)

QualityFE(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	ED	FE
P/E ratio	18.14●	25.63
Forward P/E	16.62	15.97●
P/S ratio	2.28	1.76●
P/B ratio	1.53●	2.16
PEG ratio	2.31●	6.15
EV / EBITDA	9.50●	12.32
FCF yield	7.17%●	6.58%

Profitability

Metric	ED	FE
Gross margin	65.01%●	53.77%
Operating margin	17.33%	18.72%●
Net margin	12.52%●	6.86%
ROE	8.42%	8.42%
ROIC	3.24%	4.46%●

Dividends

Metric	ED	FE
Dividend yield	3.23%	3.83%●
Payout ratio	61.40%	101.69%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	ED	FE
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	6.30%	7.52%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	11.46%●	-2.32%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	47.32%●	7.07%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	10.69%●	8.26%

Frequently asked

Which is better, ED or FE?: It depends on your goal. value: ED (lower P/E); growth: FE (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: FE (higher dividend yield); quality: FE (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, ED leads 10 to 6.
Is ED or FE cheaper?: On trailing earnings, ED is cheaper: ED trades at a 18.14 P/E and FE at 25.63.
Which has grown faster, ED or FE?: Over the past five years, FE grew revenue faster — ED at a 6.30% CAGR versus FE at 7.52%.
Does ED or FE pay a bigger dividend?: ED yields 3.23% and FE yields 3.83% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is ED or FE more profitable?: ED runs the higher net margin — ED at 12.52% versus FE at 6.86%.
Which has been the better investment, ED or FE?: Over the past 10-year, FE delivered the higher annualized total return — ED at 7.17% versus FE at 7.77%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full ED analysis Full FE analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Consolidated Edison P/E ratio FirstEnergy P/E ratio Consolidated Edison dividend yield FirstEnergy dividend yield Consolidated Edison ROE FirstEnergy ROE Consolidated Edison operating margin FirstEnergy operating margin Consolidated Edison revenue growth FirstEnergy revenue growth Consolidated Edison free cash flow FirstEnergy free cash flow

Consolidated Edison & FirstEnergy appear in these rankings

Highest Dividend Yield Stocks Dividend Aristocrats Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.