Eni S.p.A. (E) vs Diamondback Energy, Inc. (FANG)
E leads on 9 of 16 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Eni S.p.A. and Diamondback Energy, Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 28, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — E vs FANG
growth of $100 · last 14yE +2.9%FANG +928.1%FANG compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
E FANG
E vs FANG: by the numbers
- •E is the larger company ($67.41B vs $50.61B market cap).
- •E trades at the lower earnings multiple (25.01 vs 211.66 P/E).
- •E converts more revenue to profit (3.15% vs 2.65% net margin).
- •FANG grew revenue faster over the past five years (37.44% vs 12.09% CAGR).
- •FANG pays the higher dividend yield (2.45% vs 1.36%).
Which is better, E or FANG?
Metric tally: E 9 · FANG 7It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueE(lower P/E)
GrowthFANG(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeFANG(higher dividend yield)
QualityFANG(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | E | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 25.01● | 211.66 |
| Forward P/E | 9.56 | — |
| P/S ratio | 0.75● | 3.35 |
| P/B ratio | 1.22● | 1.39 |
| PEG ratio | 2.12● | 8.32 |
| EV / EBITDA | 7.68 | 7.51● |
| FCF yield | 5.12%● | 3.13% |
Profitability
| Metric | E | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 5.60% | 41.83%● |
| Operating margin | 5.36% | 32.73%● |
| Net margin | 3.15%● | 2.65% |
| ROE | 5.15%● | 1.10% |
| ROIC | 1.88% | 6.00%● |
Dividends
| Metric | E | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 1.36% | 2.45%● |
| Payout ratio | 31.00% | 76.79% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | E | FANG |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 12.09% | 37.44%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 67.18%● | 25.44% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 19.80% | 91.40%● |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 19.09%● | 18.00% |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, E or FANG?
- It depends on your goal. value: E (lower P/E); growth: FANG (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: FANG (higher dividend yield); quality: FANG (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, E leads 9 to 7.
- Is E or FANG cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, E is cheaper: E trades at a 25.01 P/E and FANG at 211.66.
- Which has grown faster, E or FANG?
- Over the past five years, FANG grew revenue faster — E at a 12.09% CAGR versus FANG at 37.44%.
- Does E or FANG pay a bigger dividend?
- E yields 1.36% and FANG yields 2.45% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is E or FANG more profitable?
- E runs the higher net margin — E at 3.15% versus FANG at 2.65%.
- Which has been the better investment, E or FANG?
- Over the past 10-year, E delivered the higher annualized total return — E at 10.52% versus FANG at 10.32%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Eni S.p.A. P/E ratioDiamondback Energy P/E ratioEni S.p.A. dividend yieldDiamondback Energy dividend yieldEni S.p.A. ROEDiamondback Energy ROEEni S.p.A. operating marginDiamondback Energy operating marginEni S.p.A. revenue growthDiamondback Energy revenue growthEni S.p.A. free cash flowDiamondback Energy free cash flow
Eni S.p.A. & Diamondback Energy appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 28, 2026.