Duke Energy Corporation (DUK) vs Vistra Corp. (VST)
DUK leads on 13 of 17 compared metrics.
A side-by-side comparison of Duke Energy Corporation and Vistra Corp. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of July 9, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).
Total return — DUK vs VST
growth of $100 · last 10yDUK +64.5%VST +898.8%VST compounded faster
Log scale — wide-divergence pair
DUK VST
DUK vs VST: by the numbers
- •DUK is the larger company ($97.65B vs $53.27B market cap).
- •DUK trades at the lower earnings multiple (19.42 vs 25.76 P/E).
- •DUK converts more revenue to profit (15.44% vs 13.82% net margin).
- •VST grew revenue faster over the past five years (6.97% vs 6.70% CAGR).
- •DUK pays the higher dividend yield (3.36% vs 0.59%).
Which is better, DUK or VST?
Metric tally: DUK 13 · VST 4It depends on what you're optimizing for:
ValueDUK(lower P/E)
GrowthVST(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)
IncomeDUK(higher dividend yield)
QualityDUK(higher ROIC)
Metrics side by side
Valuation
| Metric | DUK | VST |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio | 19.42● | 25.76 |
| Forward P/E | 18.91 | 16.73● |
| P/S ratio | 2.97● | 3.24 |
| P/B ratio | 1.81● | 9.40 |
| PEG ratio | 1.77● | 2.30 |
| EV / EBITDA | 12.27● | 21.79 |
| FCF yield | 6.68%● | 2.14% |
Profitability
| Metric | DUK | VST |
|---|---|---|
| Gross margin | 31.56%● | 12.72% |
| Operating margin | 26.98%● | 2.07% |
| Net margin | 15.44%● | 13.82% |
| ROE | 9.44% | 40.04%● |
| ROIC | 4.13%● | 3.30% |
Dividends
| Metric | DUK | VST |
|---|---|---|
| Dividend yield | 3.36%● | 0.59% |
| Payout ratio | 67.51% | 41.45% |
Growth (annualized)
| Metric | DUK | VST |
|---|---|---|
| Revenue CAGR (5Y) | 6.70% | 6.97%● |
| EPS CAGR (5Y) | 29.69%● | 11.20% |
| FCF CAGR (5Y) | 131.21%● | -11.04% |
| Total return CAGR (5Y) | 8.86% | 55.37%● |
Frequently asked
- Which is better, DUK or VST?
- It depends on your goal. value: DUK (lower P/E); growth: VST (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: DUK (higher dividend yield); quality: DUK (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, DUK leads 13 to 4.
- Is DUK or VST cheaper?
- On trailing earnings, DUK is cheaper: DUK trades at a 19.42 P/E and VST at 25.76.
- Which has grown faster, DUK or VST?
- Over the past five years, VST grew revenue faster — DUK at a 6.70% CAGR versus VST at 6.97%.
- Does DUK or VST pay a bigger dividend?
- DUK yields 3.36% and VST yields 0.59% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
- Is DUK or VST more profitable?
- DUK runs the higher net margin — DUK at 15.44% versus VST at 13.82%.
- Which has been the better investment, DUK or VST?
- Over the past 5-year, VST delivered the higher annualized total return — DUK at 8.27% versus VST at 55.37%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.
Go deeper
Dig into the metrics
Duke Energy P/E ratioVistra P/E ratioDuke Energy dividend yieldVistra dividend yieldDuke Energy ROEVistra ROEDuke Energy operating marginVistra operating marginDuke Energy revenue growthVistra revenue growthDuke Energy free cash flowVistra free cash flow
Duke Energy & Vistra appear in these rankings
Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified July 9, 2026.