Which has grown faster, DT or WULF?

Over the past five years, WULF grew revenue faster — DT at a 23.47% CAGR versus WULF at 66.83%.

Is DT or WULF more profitable?

DT runs the higher net margin — DT at 8.06% versus WULF at -611.46%.

Which has been the better investment, DT or WULF?

Over the past 5-year, WULF delivered the higher annualized total return — DT at -7.56% versus WULF at 11.07%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) vs TeraWulf Inc. (WULF)

DT leads on 8 of 11 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Dynatrace, Inc. and TeraWulf Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 26, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — DT vs WULF

growth of $100 · last 7y

DT +68.9%WULF +264.5%WULF compounded faster

DT WULF

DT vs WULF: by the numbers

•WULF is the larger company ($12.91B vs $11.74B market cap).
•DT is profitable (8.06% net margin) while WULF runs a net loss (-611.46%).
•WULF grew revenue faster over the past five years (66.83% vs 23.47% CAGR).

Which is better, DT or WULF?

Metric tally: DT 8 · WULF 3

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

GrowthWULF(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualityDT(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	DT	WULF
P/E ratio	74.83	—
P/S ratio	5.97●	65.59
P/B ratio	4.61●	73.78
PEG ratio	0.14	—
EV / EBITDA	34.30	—
FCF yield	4.38%	—

Profitability

Metric	DT	WULF
Gross margin	81.56%●	64.02%
Operating margin	13.08%●	-147.04%
Net margin	8.06%●	-611.46%
ROE	6.23%●	-470.94%
ROIC	4.99%●	-3.18%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	DT	WULF
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	23.47%	66.83%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	14.87%●	-27.04%
FCF CAGR (5Y)	20.62%	26.65%●
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-7.56%	11.84%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, DT or WULF?: It depends on your goal. growth: WULF (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: DT (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, DT leads 8 to 3.
Which has grown faster, DT or WULF?: Over the past five years, WULF grew revenue faster — DT at a 23.47% CAGR versus WULF at 66.83%.
Is DT or WULF more profitable?: DT runs the higher net margin — DT at 8.06% versus WULF at -611.46%.
Which has been the better investment, DT or WULF?: Over the past 5-year, WULF delivered the higher annualized total return — DT at -7.56% versus WULF at 11.07%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full DT analysis Full WULF analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Dynatrace P/E ratio TeraWulf P/E ratio Dynatrace dividend yield TeraWulf dividend yield Dynatrace ROE TeraWulf ROE Dynatrace operating margin TeraWulf operating margin Dynatrace revenue growth TeraWulf revenue growth Dynatrace free cash flow TeraWulf free cash flow

Dynatrace & TeraWulf appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 26, 2026.