Is DT or SIMO cheaper?

On trailing earnings, SIMO is cheaper: DT trades at a 75.70 P/E and SIMO at 21.85.

Which has grown faster, DT or SIMO?

Over the past five years, DT grew revenue faster — DT at a 23.47% CAGR versus SIMO at 12.49%.

Does DT or SIMO pay a bigger dividend?

SIMO pays a dividend (0.71% yield) while DT does not currently pay one.

Is DT or SIMO more profitable?

SIMO runs the higher net margin — DT at 8.06% versus SIMO at 16.02%.

Which has been the better investment, DT or SIMO?

Over the past 5-year, SIMO delivered the higher annualized total return — DT at -5.97% versus SIMO at 23.11%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Dynatrace, Inc. (DT) vs Silicon Motion Technology Corporation (SIMO)

SIMO leads on 9 of 15 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Dynatrace, Inc. and Silicon Motion Technology Corporation across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 14, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Silicon Motion Technology Corporation

$9.41B

$280.49Technology

Total return — DT vs SIMO

growth of $100 · last 7y

DT +70.9%SIMO +674.8%SIMO compounded faster

DT SIMO

DT vs SIMO: by the numbers

•DT is the larger company ($11.88B vs $9.41B market cap).
•SIMO trades at the lower earnings multiple (21.85 vs 75.70 P/E).
•SIMO converts more revenue to profit (16.02% vs 8.06% net margin).
•DT grew revenue faster over the past five years (23.47% vs 12.49% CAGR).
•SIMO pays a dividend (0.71% yield) while DT does not currently pay one.

Which is better, DT or SIMO?

Metric tally: DT 6 · SIMO 9

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueSIMO(lower P/E)

GrowthDT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

QualitySIMO(higher ROIC)

Valuation

Metric	DT	SIMO
P/E ratio	75.70	21.85●
Forward P/E	—	32.07
P/S ratio	6.04	2.66●
P/B ratio	4.66	2.84●
PEG ratio	0.14●	0.17
EV / EBITDA	34.74	12.65●
FCF yield	4.33%●	0.27%

Profitability

Metric	DT	SIMO
Gross margin	81.56%●	48.09%
Operating margin	13.08%●	12.77%
Net margin	8.06%	16.02%●
ROE	6.23%	18.76%●
ROIC	4.99%	9.22%●

Dividends

Metric	DT	SIMO
Dividend yield	—	0.71%
Payout ratio	—	13.70%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	DT	SIMO
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	23.47%●	12.49%
EPS CAGR (5Y)	14.87%	44.85%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	20.62%●	-42.00%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	-5.97%	37.00%●

Frequently asked

Which is better, DT or SIMO?: It depends on your goal. value: SIMO (lower P/E); growth: DT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); quality: SIMO (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, SIMO leads 9 to 6.
Is DT or SIMO cheaper?: On trailing earnings, SIMO is cheaper: DT trades at a 75.70 P/E and SIMO at 21.85.
Which has grown faster, DT or SIMO?: Over the past five years, DT grew revenue faster — DT at a 23.47% CAGR versus SIMO at 12.49%.
Does DT or SIMO pay a bigger dividend?: SIMO pays a dividend (0.71% yield) while DT does not currently pay one.
Is DT or SIMO more profitable?: SIMO runs the higher net margin — DT at 8.06% versus SIMO at 16.02%.
Which has been the better investment, DT or SIMO?: Over the past 5-year, SIMO delivered the higher annualized total return — DT at -5.97% versus SIMO at 23.11%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full DT analysis Full SIMO analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Dynatrace P/E ratio Silicon Motion Technology P/E ratio Dynatrace dividend yield Silicon Motion Technology dividend yield Dynatrace ROE Silicon Motion Technology ROE Dynatrace operating margin Silicon Motion Technology operating margin Dynatrace revenue growth Silicon Motion Technology revenue growth Dynatrace free cash flow Silicon Motion Technology free cash flow

Dynatrace & Silicon Motion Technology appear in these rankings

Fastest Revenue Growth Stocks Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 14, 2026.