Is DRS or TXT cheaper?

On trailing earnings, TXT is cheaper: DRS trades at a 41.38 P/E and TXT at 16.55.

Which has grown faster, DRS or TXT?

Over the past five years, TXT grew revenue faster — DRS at a 5.14% CAGR versus TXT at 5.26%.

Does DRS or TXT pay a bigger dividend?

DRS yields 0.81% and TXT yields 0.09% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.

Is DRS or TXT more profitable?

DRS runs the higher net margin — DRS at 7.85% versus TXT at 6.15%.

Which has been the better investment, DRS or TXT?

Over the past 10-year, DRS delivered the higher annualized total return — DRS at 44.53% versus TXT at 9.35%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Leonardo DRS, Inc. (DRS) vs Textron Inc. (TXT)

TXT leads on 10 of 17 compared metrics.

A side-by-side comparison of Leonardo DRS, Inc. and Textron Inc. across valuation, profitability, dividends, and growth — built entirely from reported fundamentals, as of June 24, 2026. The ● marks the stronger figure on each row (cheaper multiple, higher margin/return).

Total return — DRS vs TXT

growth of $100 · last 30y

DRS -29.9%TXT +328.0%TXT compounded faster

Log scale — wide-divergence pair

DRS TXT

DRS vs TXT: by the numbers

•TXT is the larger company ($15.05B vs $11.92B market cap).
•TXT trades at the lower earnings multiple (16.55 vs 41.38 P/E).
•DRS converts more revenue to profit (7.85% vs 6.15% net margin).
•TXT grew revenue faster over the past five years (5.26% vs 5.14% CAGR).
•DRS pays the higher dividend yield (0.81% vs 0.09%).

Which is better, DRS or TXT?

Metric tally: DRS 7 · TXT 10

It depends on what you're optimizing for:

ValueTXT(lower P/E)

GrowthTXT(faster 5Y revenue CAGR)

IncomeDRS(higher dividend yield)

QualityDRS(higher ROIC)

Metrics side by side

Valuation

Metric	DRS	TXT
P/E ratio	41.38	16.55●
Forward P/E	31.18	11.82●
P/S ratio	3.25	1.00●
P/B ratio	4.34	1.91●
PEG ratio	1.10	1.02●
EV / EBITDA	26.22	10.51●
FCF yield	2.51%	4.64%●

Profitability

Metric	DRS	TXT
Gross margin	24.06%●	14.41%
Operating margin	9.91%●	8.37%
Net margin	7.85%●	6.15%
ROE	10.47%	11.67%●
ROIC	8.37%●	7.33%

Dividends

Metric	DRS	TXT
Dividend yield	0.81%●	0.09%
Payout ratio	34.29%	1.57%

Growth (annualized)

Metric	DRS	TXT
Revenue CAGR (5Y)	5.14%	5.26%●
EPS CAGR (5Y)	13.00%	30.49%●
FCF CAGR (5Y)	21.01%●	6.96%
Total return CAGR (5Y)	29.91%●	5.46%

Frequently asked

Which is better, DRS or TXT?: It depends on your goal. value: TXT (lower P/E); growth: TXT (faster 5Y revenue CAGR); income: DRS (higher dividend yield); quality: DRS (higher ROIC). Across all compared metrics, TXT leads 10 to 7.
Is DRS or TXT cheaper?: On trailing earnings, TXT is cheaper: DRS trades at a 41.38 P/E and TXT at 16.55.
Which has grown faster, DRS or TXT?: Over the past five years, TXT grew revenue faster — DRS at a 5.14% CAGR versus TXT at 5.26%.
Does DRS or TXT pay a bigger dividend?: DRS yields 0.81% and TXT yields 0.09% based on trailing dividends and the latest price.
Is DRS or TXT more profitable?: DRS runs the higher net margin — DRS at 7.85% versus TXT at 6.15%.
Which has been the better investment, DRS or TXT?: Over the past 10-year, DRS delivered the higher annualized total return — DRS at 44.53% versus TXT at 9.35%. Past performance doesn't predict future results.

Go deeper

Full DRS analysis Full TXT analysis Interactive comparison tool

Dig into the metrics

Leonardo DRS P/E ratio Textron P/E ratio Leonardo DRS dividend yield Textron dividend yield Leonardo DRS ROE Textron ROE Leonardo DRS operating margin Textron operating margin Leonardo DRS revenue growth Textron revenue growth Leonardo DRS free cash flow Textron free cash flow

Leonardo DRS & Textron appear in these rankings

Highest FCF Yield Stocks Best 10-Year Total Return Stocks

Figures are sourced from reported fundamentals and the latest end-of-day price. This comparison is informational only and is not investment advice. Past performance does not predict future results. See our methodology. Compiled by TGMCharts Research · data verified June 24, 2026.